<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">84</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Andrographis Paniculata, 2% Chlorhexidine and 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis- An Invitro Study&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>C.1</surname><given-names>Ravi Varman</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>S.2</surname><given-names>Thillainayagam</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>D.S.3</surname><given-names>Dinesh</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>A.4</surname><given-names>Jaisenthil</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>N.B.5</surname><given-names>Bharath</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>S.6</surname><given-names>Karthikeyan</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>20</day><month>01</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume/><issue/><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Aim: To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 0.5% phytochemical extracts of Andrographis Paniculata (AP), 2% Chlorhexidine (CHX) and 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis.&#13;
Methodology: Forty freshly extracted human single rooted mandibular premolars were selected, decoronated and standardized to 12mm root length. Cleaning and shaping was done using ProTaper__ampersandsignreg; (Dentsply) up to size F3 and irrigated with 3% NaOCl. Contamination of the specimens was carried out for 21 days at 37__ampersandsignordm;C. The specimens were then divided into four groups (n=10) for irrigation with 0.5% AP, 2% CHX, 5.25% NaOCl and distilled water as control. Before and after irrigation, microbiological samples were collected using sterilized paper points, and efficacy was expressed as reduction in microbial load using Colony Forming Units. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way Anova/Kruskal-Wallis test with Tukey__ampersandsignrsquo;s Post Hoc test.&#13;
Result: In the root canals, the 0.5% herbal extract of AP was found to be equally effective to 2% CHX and highly effective than 5.25% NaOCl against Enterococcus faecalis with a marked decrease in the number of CFU at the 48th hr. from 2.6 x10__ampersandsignsup3; to 0.9 x10__ampersandsignsup3;. The values were statistically significant with p__ampersandsignlt;0.5.&#13;
Conclusion: Being a herbal extract with antimicrobial efficacy similar to 2% CHX, 0.5% AP seems to be a better alternative. However further tests and randomised clinical trials are required on AP to use it as an endodontic irrigant in vivo&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Enterococcus faecalis</kwd><kwd> Endodontic irrigant</kwd><kwd> Leaf extracts</kwd><kwd> Andrographis paniculata</kwd><kwd> Colony forming unit</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
