<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">626</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>EFFICACY OF NARROW BAND VERSUS BROAD BAND IN TREATMENT OF PITYRIASIS ROSEA&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Waked</surname><given-names>Intsar S.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Deghidi</surname><given-names>Abdel Hamid N.</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><volume/><issue/><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Background: UV phototherapy has recently demonstrated high levels of efficacy and tolerability for treating a variety of inflammatory skin diseases.&#13;
Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of narrow band versus broad band in the treatment of pityriasis rosea.&#13;
Methods: Twenty patients (12 female __ampersandsignamp; 8 male) with extensive pityriasis rosea type III __ampersandsignamp; IV were participated in the study. Their ages ranged between 18 and 35 years.The right half of the body of each patient was irradiated with NB-UVB ,while left side of each patient is exposed to broadband BB-UVB for 3 times alternatively per week until clearing of lesions or for 6 weeks. The rate of clearing was monitored by estimating the pityriasis rosea severity (PRSS) score and the pruritus score.&#13;
Results: The extent of disease (PRSS) for Rt side decreased from (34.30__ampersandsignplusmn;10.16vs. 10.50__ampersandsignplusmn;7.00, respectively__ampersandsignlt;0.05) while for Lt side (35.90__ampersandsignplusmn;10.31.vs. 16.00__ampersandsignplusmn;9.06). The percentage of reduction in intensity of puritis were 53%, 49%, for NBUVB side and BBUVB side respectively.&#13;
Conclusion: This study shows that NBUVB was more effective than BBUVB in reduction of PRSS and the degree of pruritus in pityriasis rosea.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pityriasis rosea</kwd><kwd> Pityriasis rosea severity score</kwd><kwd> UVNB and UVBB</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
