<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">517</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>PHOTOGRAPHY AND PIXEL ISSUES IN UNDERGRADUATE SLIDES IN PATHOLOGY&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lingegowda</surname><given-names>Jyothi B.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Muddegowda</surname><given-names>Prakash H.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Ramkumar Kurpad</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Konapur</surname><given-names>Prasanna G.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Sathiyamurthy</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Thamilselvi</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><volume>)</volume><issue/><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Digital images have become an important tool in pathology. Telepathology towards consultation is rapidly developing. Teaching through digital slides is growing fast due to easily availability of digital cameras, computer hardware and the internet.&#13;
Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate the resolution requirement for digital images. Size of data of these digital images and there upload speed was also evaluated.&#13;
Methods: Digital images of 29 selected slides showing characteristic lesions were produced in five different resolutions each, ranging from 640x480, 2048x1536, 2592x1944, 3264x2448 and 4000x3000---. They were compared individually by a group of two experienced pathologists regarding the diagnoses and level of confidence.&#13;
Results: Images at the resolution of 2048x1536 were perceived as equivalent to higher resolutions, Data upload and image loading was significantly better in 2048x1536 rather than 4000x3000 images&#13;
Conclusion: For digital images in dermatology a resolution of 768 x 512 x 24 is suitable to recognize the relevant details of the source image.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Adenocarcinoma stomach</kwd><kwd> Basal cell carcinoma</kwd><kwd> Fatty liver</kwd><kwd> Follicular adenoma</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
