<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4832</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url">https://doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2024.162401</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&#13;
	A Cephalometric Study for Evaluation and Comparison of the Cranial Base Angles and Cranial Base Length and the Effective Maxillary and Mandibular Lengths in Class I, Class II, and Class II Subdivision Malocclusion among Male and Female Adults in Kundrathur Population&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
	 &#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
	 &#13;
&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>K</surname><given-names>Parvathi</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sainath</surname><given-names>M.C.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nambi</surname><given-names>Navaneetha</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>U</surname><given-names>Vivekanandan</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rayen</surname><given-names>Lasington</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>4)</volume><issue/><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>&#13;
	Introduction: The relationship between malocclusions and skeletal morphology is a popular topic of maxillofacial developmental research. As one of the most common diagnostic records is the cephalogram, the relationship among cranial base angle, cranial base length, maxilla, and mandible can easily be determined. Using Steiner’s cephalometric analysis, malocclusions can be easily classified by ANB angle.&#13;
	Materials and Methods: A total of 60 cephalograms (30% males and 30% females) were available for the present study). The inclusion criteria were patients with Natives of Kundrathur.&#13;
	Results: The mean maxillary length and mandibular length was highest among the study subjects of Class I malocclusion.&#13;
	Conclusion: Sexual dimorphism was statistically significant as the males have increased maxillary length, and mandibular length than females.&#13;
	Key Words: Class I, Class II and class II subdivision malocclusion Cranial base angle, Cranial base length, Mandibular length, Maxillary length&#13;
&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Class I</kwd><kwd/><kwd> Cranial base length</kwd><kwd> Mandibular length</kwd><kwd> Maxillary length</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
