<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4664</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"> https://doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2021.13537</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&#13;
	Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Post-traumatic Ankylosis of Temporomandibular Joint Using Conventional Rotary Bur technique and Piezosurgery Unit&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
	 &#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
	 &#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
	 &#13;
&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Veenita</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nayan</surname><given-names>Swapna</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Keswani</surname><given-names>Ekta</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Venkateshwar</surname><given-names>Gokul</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Navlakha</surname><given-names>Komal</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Shambhavi</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>3</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>)</volume><issue/><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>201</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>&#13;
	Introduction: The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is the most active joint of the body. Limitations of the mouth opening can be caused by bony or fibrous ankylosis of the TMJ as a sequela to trauma, infection, autoimmune disease or failed surgery. A significant effect of TMJ ankylosis is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) which can progressively worsen and the symptoms associated with OSA can dominate sidelining the primary disorder itself. Aim/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the use of conventional rotary bur technique and piezosurgery unit for gap arthroplasty in TMJ ankylosis. Method Used: Twenty patients were examined clinically and radiologically for the treatment. Out of the twenty patients, ten patients were operated using conventional rotary bur technique (Group A) and the remaining ten patients were operated using piezosurgery unit (Group B). Two major parameters that is blood loss and duration of surgery were evaluated intraoperatively and other parameters like pain, mouth opening, swelling and paraesthesia were evaluated on Post Operative Day (POD)-1, 5, 10, 15. Result: We observed that there was a significant reduction in blood loss intraoperatively with the piezosurgery unit though the operating time was prolonged. Post-operative physiotherapy had increased the inter-incisal distance in both groups. Pain levels and swelling were significantly higher in Group A. Other complications like paresthesia were not observed in either of the groups. Conclusion: This comparative study suggests piezosurgery can be a valuable alternative method to the bur technique due to its efficacy in the evaluated parameters.&#13;
&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gap arthroplasty</kwd><kwd> Piezosurgery</kwd><kwd> Temporomandibular joint ankylosis</kwd><kwd> Rotary bur technique</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
