<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">449</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>CRVO: OPTIC NERVE DIAMETER ALONG WITH VARIABLE EJECTION FRACTION A RISK FACTOR?&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chowdhury</surname><given-names>Sanjoy</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>Hitesh</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bhosale</surname><given-names>Pratik</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chowdhury</surname><given-names>Nilanjan</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>20</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>)</volume><issue/><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Background: Retinal vein occlusion is second commonest retinal vasculopathy. Narrow optic nerve diameter is a risk factor. A variation in ventricular ejection fraction can alter pressure inside any blood vessel.&#13;
Purpose: To study ejection fraction in all cases of Retinal Vein Occlusion&#13;
Methods: Prospective nonrandomised cohort study since 1997 to 2012.Standard protocol was followed in all cases of RVO.A/B Scan and echocardiography was done to assess optic nerve diameter and ejection fraction respectively. Equal number of matched controls was registered.&#13;
Results: 82 cases of RVO, mean age 48.5, male preponderance in below 40 years. Variable ejection between preserved (pEF__ampersandsigngt;50%) and reduced (rEF__ampersandsignlt;50%) was significantly associated with RVO. Multivariate regression analysis shows RVO__ampersandsignrsquo;s significant association between narrower optic nerve diameter, shorter axial length and variable ejection fraction&#13;
Conclusion: Variable Ejection fraction is a risk factor in RVO.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Retinal vein occlusion</kwd><kwd> Optic nerve diameter</kwd><kwd> Ejection fraction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
