<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4252</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"> http://dx.doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2021.132312</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Clinical Usefulness of Lateral Flow Antigen Detection Assay and PCR for Laboratory Diagnosis of Cryptococcal Infections&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chitharagi</surname><given-names>Vidyavathi B</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>S</surname><given-names>Jhency Anjali</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>S</surname><given-names/></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>M</surname><given-names>Raghavendra Rao</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mahale</surname><given-names>Rashmi P</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gowda</surname><given-names>Ranjitha Shankare</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>1</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>3)</volume><issue/><fpage>76</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Introduction: Cryptococcus neoformans is the most common opportunistic fungal pathogen that affects the central nervous system and meningitis is caused by Cryptococcusis a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV.1 About 5% of meningeal infections are caused by Cryptococcus neoformans, which is tops among non-tuberculous causes. Be ing the most common opportunistic infection in AIDS patients, it has been reported to account for about 2-7% of all opportunistic infection.2India ink examination for the demonstration of the capsule is the most widely used technique for rapid diagnosis, although it has less sensitivity. Microscopic methods and fungal culture though considered as specific tests they show the sensitivity of 50__ampersandsignndash;80%, and fungal culture takes 2-3 days for the report. Aims and Objective: The present study was carried out to assess the utility of Cryptococcal antigen detection by lateral flow assay (LFA) for the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. Methodology: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample sent for India ink examination for Cryptococcuscollected from 116 patients suspected of cryptococcal meningitis over 1 year were included in the study. These samples were subjected to Gram stain, fungal culture, antigen detection by LFA and PCR. Results: Of the 116 CSF samples tested, 20 (17.2%) samples were positive by LFA, among which 5 (4.31%) samples were also positive in India ink preparation, Gram__ampersandsignrsquo;s staining, fungal culture and PCR. Conclusion: Antigen detection for Cryptococci must be prioritized over microscopy and culture for the diagnosis. Identification of Cryptococci by antigen detection and molecular methods are very much useful in the laboratory diagnosis of Cryptococcal infection.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd> Lateral flow assay</kwd><kwd> Cryptococcus</kwd><kwd> India ink</kwd><kwd> CS</kwd><kwd> Antigen</kwd><kwd> PCR</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
