<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4177</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url">http://dx.doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2021.132015</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comparison of Bag and Non-Bag Extraction of Gall Stones through Laparoscopy&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chinnaswami</surname><given-names>Adith</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Purushothaman</surname><given-names>Prabhu</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Duthaluri</surname><given-names>Naresh</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Arcot</surname><given-names>Rekha</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>24</day><month>10</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>0)</volume><issue/><fpage>102</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard surgical procedure of choice for disorders involving the gall bladder and biliary tract. There are several intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with LC of which port site infections(PSI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The present study was carried out to compare the outcomes with bag and non -bag extraction of gall bladder in terms of the incidence of PSI. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was carried out among 326 adults who underwent LC for two years. The participants were randomized into bag extraction and non-bag extraction groups. Postoperatively, the participants were followed up for one week to evaluate the incidence of PSI. Results: The incidence of PSI among bag extraction was 1.4% compared to 9.1% in the non-bag extraction. The presence of diabetes mellitus, elevated glycosylated haemoglobin and immunocompromised status were proven to be risk factors for PSI. (p__ampersandsignlt;0.001) Conclusion: Since bag extraction is associated with lower rates of infection, it is advisable to follow bag extraction as a routine procedure in all LC surgeries, especially in high-risk groups like diabetes mellitus and immunocompromised states.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd> Bag extraction</kwd><kwd> End glove</kwd><kwd> Gall bladder diseases</kwd><kwd> Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy</kwd><kwd> Port site infections</kwd><kwd> Randomized  controlled trial</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
