<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3212</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url">http://dx.doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2020.122424</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comparison between Ropivacaine 0.25% and Bupivacaine 0.25% in Paediatric Caudal Anaesthesia in Infra Umbilical Surgeries (A Study of 60 Cases)&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>Tejash H.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>Kaushik</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chauhan</surname><given-names>Dinesh</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>Jatin</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname><given-names>Nilam</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>14</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>4)</volume><issue/><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>114</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Background: Caudal epidural is the most common regional anaesthesia technique for treating post-operative pain in pediatric patients. It is commonly used for procedures like urogenital, rectal, inguinal and lower extremity surgery. Objective: To compare the anaesthetic potential of bupivacaine 0.25% and ropivacaine 0.25% for infra-umbilical surgical procedures.&#13;
Methods: This study included 60 children of ASA (American society of anesthesiologists) I __ampersandsignamp; II grade of either gender, scheduled for various elective infra-umbilical surgical procedures. Patients were randomized to receive bupivacaine 0.25% or ropivacaine 0.25% each total dose of 1 ml kg-1. The randomization sequence was computer-generated and prepared in a double-blind manner. Post-operative motor block was assessed with Bromage motor scale and postoperative analgesia was observed with an observer pain scale. Statistical data were analyzed by using student__ampersandsignrsquo;s unpaired t-test.&#13;
Results: The mean duration of analgesia in group B was 266.0__ampersandsignplusmn;1.89 minutes and group R was 251__ampersandsignplusmn;2.68 minutes. The difference was statistically highly significant (p__ampersandsignlt;0.0001). The mean duration of motor block in group B was 236.0__ampersandsignplusmn;1.89 minutes and in the group, R was 204__ampersandsignplusmn;2.22 minutes. The difference was statistically highly significant (p__ampersandsignlt;0.0001).&#13;
Conclusion: In the present study caudal administration of bupivacaine 0.25% (1 ml kg-1) resulted in a longer duration of analgesia and motor block compared with 0.25% ropivacaine (1 ml kg-1), with no significant difference in the hemodynamics and the incidence of side effects.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Caudal block</kwd><kwd> Bupivacaine 0.25%</kwd><kwd> Ropivacaine 0.25%</kwd><kwd> Paediatric</kwd><kwd> Infra umbilical surgeries</kwd><kwd> Age 4-6 years.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
