<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2938</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"> http://dx.doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2020.12196</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Reliability of Physical Examination and Electrocardiogram in Determination of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Hospital Based Study&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wasalwar</surname><given-names>Gajanan V.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wasnik</surname><given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>6</day><month>10</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>9)</volume><issue/><fpage>168</fpage><lpage>171</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Although acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common disorder that makes people seek emergency healthcare, there is little evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs, for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Aims: Current study was done to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination __ampersandsignamp; electrocardiogram for detecting acute myocardial infarction compared to the reference standard. Material: Of the 481 patients enrolled, we evaluated 450 patients, 279 (62%) men and 171 women (38%); aged 20 years to 90 years. The patients with acute myocardial infarction were aged almost similar to those without infarction (58.6 vs. 57.1 years). Results: The prevalence of acute myocardial infarction was 41% (187 of 450). Of the 187 patients with acute AMI, 145 (78%) were assigned a discharge diagnosis of ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 42 (22%) were assigned a diagnosis of non-ST elevated myocardial infarction. A total of 34 of 145 (23%) patients with STEMI died, compared to 4 of 42(10%) patients with non-STEMI. Conclusion: Our study concluded that no single sign or symptom or a laboratory diagnostic method with possible acute MI proved effective enough alone to rule in or out AMI.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd> Myocardial infarction</kwd><kwd> Electrocardiogram</kwd><kwd> STEMI</kwd><kwd> smoking</kwd><kwd> Obesity</kwd><kwd> Hypertension and diabetes</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
