<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2090</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>EFFECT OF CERVICAL SPINE MOBILIZATION IN THE TREATMENT OF MECHANICAL NECK PAIN-A&#13;
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Prabhu</surname><given-names>Anupama</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>Ravi Shankar</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>BM</surname><given-names>Ganesh</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><volume>)</volume><issue/><fpage>168</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Background: Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is the most common type of neck pain having its occurrence&#13;
in general population. In mechanical neck pain there is reduction in mobility of either a single segment or&#13;
multiple segments of cervical and thoracic spine in association with pain. This study attempted to&#13;
determine the effect of cervical mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain.&#13;
Methods: 28 subjects were recruited and randomized into experimental and control group. The subjects&#13;
in the experimental group received moist heat for 15 minutes, thoracic thrust manipulations and cervical&#13;
mobilization and control group received moist heat for 15 minutes and thoracic thrust manipulation. Both&#13;
the groups received intervention for a period of five sessions. The outcome measures Visual analog scale&#13;
(VAS), cervical range of motion (CROM) and neck disability index (NDI) were measured before the&#13;
intervention and following five sessions of intervention in both the groups.&#13;
Results: Pre and post comparison within the groups showed a significant difference in all the outcome&#13;
measures i.e. VAS, NDI and CROM in both experimental and control groups (p__ampersandsignlt;0.05) but there was no&#13;
significant difference between the groups for all the outcome measures (P__ampersandsigngt;0.05).&#13;
Conclusion: Both cervical mobilization and thoracic thrust mobilization was effective in the management&#13;
of MNP. Cervical mobilization was not superior to thoracic thrust manipulation alone in the management&#13;
of MNP.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mobilization</kwd><kwd> Mechanical neck pain</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
