<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1954</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>KNOWLEDGE AND OPINION OF CAREGIVERS REGARDING CHILDHOOD ADDITIONAL VACCINES&#13;
IN AGARTALA, WEST TRIPURA&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nilratan</surname><given-names>Majumder</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sekhar</surname><given-names>Datta Shib</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Vinodrao</surname><given-names>Boratne Abhijit</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nilanjan</surname><given-names>Majumder</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chandrika</surname><given-names>Basu Majumder</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><volume/><issue/><fpage>115</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Introduction:&#13;
Despite growing vaccine-preventable infections, immunization campaigns still suffer due to parental resistance. Knowledge and opinion of caregivers about childhood additional vaccines becomes imperative before we stress upon any such promotion under UIP. Objective: To assess knowledge and opinion of caregivers regarding childhood additional vaccines in Agartala, Tripura.&#13;
&#13;
Methods: Present study was undertaken during Jul-Dec 2011 in a child clinic at Agartala. Data was collected using pre-designed and pre-tested proforma by interview technique. Information regarding background characteristics of parents, source of information, knowledge and opinion regarding childhood additional vaccines was collected after obtaining written consent. Data analysed using Microsoft Excel and Epi_Info version 6.04. Chi-square test was used and p__ampersandsignlt;0.05 considered statistically significant.&#13;
&#13;
Results:&#13;
Information was gathered from parents of 180 children. Doctors (73.33%) were main source of information followed by television (18.89%). 26.67% and 32.78% parents respectively knew timing and against which diseases additional vaccines are used. 73.89% parents reported vaccination as best way to prevent these diseases. 76.11% opined additional vaccines should be available at govt. hospitals. 46.67% recognized polyvalent vaccines better than monovalent. Numbers of injections (89.29%), cost (21.43%), numbers of visits (16.67%) and less complications (15.48%) were cited for such preference. Financial constrain (46.11%), family disagreement (26.67%), time constrain (20%), fear of complication (18.89%) and non-availability (8.89%) were stated as barriers. Parents__ampersandsignlsquo; education (69.44%) and economic status (41.11%) were stated as family related reason for poor acceptance of additional vaccines.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusion: Parents__ampersandsignlsquo; knowledge-gap, opinion and operational issues should be addressed before launching and promoting any childhood additional vaccine campaign.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Care givers</kwd><kwd> Childhood Additional vaccine</kwd><kwd> Immunization</kwd><kwd> Parents</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
