<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1908</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ANTIMICROBIAL EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL PREPARATION TECHNIQUES USING K- FILES AND K- NITI FLEX - AN INVITRO STUDY&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pari</surname><given-names>Arul</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rao</surname><given-names>Arun Prasad</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Thayumanavan</surname><given-names/></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>C.Vijay</surname><given-names/></name></contrib></contrib-group><volume/><issue/><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Enterococcus faecalis is the most commonly isolated or detected species from oral infections&#13;
including marginal periodontitis, infected root canal and periradicular diseases. So, the&#13;
elimination of bacteria, their products and substrate enhances the success rate of endodontic&#13;
therapy. Thus, this study was done to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of two different root&#13;
canal techniques using K-file and K-Nitiflex. 30 intact right and left maxillary premolars&#13;
extracted for orthodontic reasons were included in this study, after pulp extirpation, teeth were decoronated and autoclaved. Root canals were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis&#13;
suspension incubated at 37__ampersandsigndeg; for 24 hours. Six teeth were randomly allocated to five groups such as Step back preparation using K-file, Step back preparation using K-Nitiflex , Standard&#13;
preparation using K-file, Standard preparation using K-Nitiflex and Saline irrigation. A pretreatment and Post- treatment sample was obtained and its prevalence was evaluated using cultivation. All the data were statistically evaluated. The results suggest that the reduction in bacterial counts were statistically significant with step back using K-file and K-Nitiflex file and also standard technique using K-file and K-Nitiflex file. Finally, the present study concludes, that mechanical effects along with the adjunctive chemical substances possessing antimicrobial properties would effectively eradicate root canal infections.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Root canal therapy</kwd><kwd> Enterococcus faecalis</kwd><kwd> step back technique</kwd><kwd> standard technique</kwd><kwd> K-Nitiflex</kwd><kwd> K-File.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
