<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1839</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>USE OF ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN SURGICAL AND MEDICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS - A&#13;
COMPARATIVE STUDY&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Agrawal</surname><given-names>Apurva</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ganguly</surname><given-names>Barna</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>25</day><month>04</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume/><issue/><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Aims: To study the extent and pattern of use of antibiotics for prophylaxis in medical and surgical intensive care units. Subjects and Methods: 100 patients each from SICU and MICU were included inthe study. Case record files were analyzed daily until discharge from ICU or a maximum of 21 days. Details of all antibiotics prescribed for prophylaxis were recorded in a proforma, which were then analyzed using relevant statistical tests. Results: 65% patients in MICU and 99% in SICU received antibiotics (p value __ampersandsignlt;0.0001). Among patients who received antibiotics, 37% in MICU and 73% in SICU received them for prophylaxis (p value __ampersandsignlt;0.0001). Average duration of prophylaxis was 2.58 days in MICU and 3.14 days in SICU. 19 (79.14%) patients in MICU and 48 (66.67%) patients in SICU received prophylaxis for more than 24 hours (p value = 0.3690). 15 (62.5%) patients in MICU and 31 (43%) patients in SICU received combination of antibiotics for prophylaxis (p value = 0.156). Third generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics for prophylaxis in both ICUs. Conclusion: Widespread use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in ICUs with broad spectrum antibiotics and antibiotic combinations, with duration longer than recommended has emerged as area of concern in__ampersandsignnbsp;present study. Such surveillance studies help in recognition of areas requiring special attention, which can&#13;
guide the formulation of antibiotic prescription policies at individual ICU level.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Antibiotic</kwd><kwd> antimicrobial resistance</kwd><kwd> ICU.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
