<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="healthcare" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">134</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>REFLECTIONS OF MEDICAL STUDENTS ON CADAVERIC DISSECTION IN PRESENT SCENARIO&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rani</surname><given-names>Anita</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chopra</surname><given-names>Jyoti</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rani</surname><given-names>Archana</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Verma</surname><given-names>Rakesh Kumar</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pankaj</surname><given-names>Arvind Kumar</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><volume>)</volume><issue/><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Objective: Continuation of cadaveric dissection in era of computer assisted learning is losing its charm in many medical schools worldwide. For the past few years, we were observing that our undergraduates were not able to complete the whole body dissection in time. Therefore, we planned to substitute dissection with demonstration of carefully dissected parts (prosections). The views of students were taken regarding dissection and demonstration of prosections for learning anatomy.&#13;
Methods: A questionnaire regarding perception of human cadaveric dissection, preference towards demonstration of prosections for anatomy learning and problems encountered during dissection was distributed to the first year MBBS students (n=243) immediately after completion of first professional examination.&#13;
Results: Majority (78%) of students were in favor of performing dissection but only 45% students performed dissection when the chance was given to them. 49% students did not dissect all the allotted regions while 6% students never attempted for dissection. 21% students were not able to complete the given dissection task. Prosection alone was least preferred whereas 50% students voted for both activities. 33% expressed that dissection alone is sufficient.&#13;
Students felt that cadaveric dissection helped them in understanding of the subject. They also expressed that shortage of time, mass bunking, lack of supervision by teachers, excessive fat, lack of prior knowledge and irritating formalin fumes are some difficulties which they face while performing dissection.&#13;
Conclusion: Dissection should continue to be a cornerstone in learning gross anatomy but only after reframing objectives which are realistic and achievable in given time frame. Prosected parts should be used as an adjunct for teaching and learning in anatomy.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cadaver</kwd><kwd> Dissection</kwd><kwd> Prosection</kwd><kwd> Medical student</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
