<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="technology" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1229</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url">http://dx.doi.org/10.7324/IJCRR.2017.91113</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Technology</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Performance Visualization of Gnome Sort in Worst Case Implemented Using R in Three Personal Computers&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>Dipankar</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>Priyanka</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dey</surname><given-names>Rishab</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Modak</surname><given-names>Sreya</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>12</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>)</volume><issue/><fpage>64</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Aim: To visualize the performances of the Gnome sort in the worst case in three different personal computers and to identify through visual inspection whether the performances of the Gnome Sort in the worst case follows quadratic nature or not.&#13;
Methodology: The Gnome sort algorithm is implemented using R. For the purpose of the study, the researchers have used three (3) different personal computers having different configurations. The entire experiment have been carried out for data size one hundred (100) to data size two thousand (2000) with an interval of one hundred (100). The performances (data size versus average run time in seconds) of Gnome sort algorithm in the worst case in all the three personal computers are visualized using scatter plots and quadratic curves.&#13;
Results: The performances of Gnome sort in the worst case implemented using R in all the three personal computers under study shows similar patterns which are very close to quadratic curves.&#13;
Conclusion: From the study using visual inspections, we may conclude that the performances of Gnome sort in the worst case in all the three (3) cases are approximately following quadratic nature.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gnome sort</kwd><kwd> Worst Case</kwd><kwd> Performance Visualization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
