<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.0" article-type="general-sciences" lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">IJCRR</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">I Journ Cur Res Re</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Current Research and Review</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">I Journ Cur Res Re</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2231-2196</issn><issn pub-type="opub">0975-5241</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Radiance Research Academy</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1103</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi"/><article-id pub-id-type="doi-url"/><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>General Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATION RULES FOR TWO UNIVERIATE POPULATIONS&#13;
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bulus</surname><given-names>Hashimu</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>)</volume><issue/><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>This article is copyright of Popeye Publishing, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>Three procedures for classifying an entity into one of the two predetermined univariate populations 1__ampersandsignnbsp;and ?2 were derived, evaluated and compared. This paper proposes Unspecified structure of the__ampersandsignnbsp;variance, Regression Discriminant (RD) and Elongated Discriminant (ED) procedures for the classification using k repeated observations collected on each entity j at time t (t = 1,2,__ampersandsignhellip;, k;j = 1,2,__ampersandsignhellip;,ni; i = 1,2). Mean arterial pressure which is a function of systolic and diastolic blood pressures were collected sequentially in time from two sampled populations ?1(survivors) and ?2 (nonsurvivors),&#13;
of hypertensive patients admitted at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (J.U.T.H).Three techniques: re-substitution, leave __ampersandsignndash; one out and partitioning of samples are used to construct and evaluate the sample based classification rules. Probabilities of misclassification obtained from the confusion matrices produced by these techniques are used to compare the performances of these rules. The analysis reveals that the procedures compare favourably with one another and the Fisher__ampersandsignrsquo;s commonly used rule. The classification rule obtained using Elongated Discriminant procedure performs&#13;
better with lower error rates. This is followed by unspecified structure of the variance and regression discriminant procedure in that order.&#13;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Classification Rule</kwd><kwd> Elongated Discriminant</kwd><kwd> Regression Discriminant</kwd><kwd> Unspecified variance –covariance structure and univariate populations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>
