Radiance Research AcademyInternational Journal of Current Research and Review2231-21960975-52411612EnglishN2024June30Life Sciences Use of AI in Pediatric Occupational Therapy: A Review English0106Nirvi SharmaEnglish The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in pediatric occupational therapy (OT) has emerged as a promising avenue for enhancing assessment, intervention, and outcomes for children with diverse developmental needs. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current state of AI applications in pediatric OT, highlighting key findings, benefits, challenges, and future directions. AI technologies, including machine learning algorithms, computer vision systems, and wearable sensors, offer innovative approaches to assess children’s motor skills, sensory responses, and cognitive functions objectively and efficiently. AI-driven intervention strategies, such as personalized treatment planning, adaptive task selection, virtual reality environments, and gamified activities, promote engagement, motivation, and skill acquisition among pediatric patients. Additionally, AI-powered telehealth platforms enable remote delivery of OT services, real-time monitoring of patient progress, and access to care for underserved populations. However, challenges related to data privacy, ethical decision-making, disparities in access, and therapist education must be addressed to ensure the ethical, effective, and equitable integration of AI into pediatric OT practice. By embracing ongoing research, collaboration, and innovation, pediatric OT practitioners can harness the transformative potential of AI to improve outcomes and quality of life for children and families worldwide. EnglishOccupational Therapy, Artificial Intelligence, Motor skills, Cognitive Function, Pediatric Patients, Virtual Realityhttp://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=4808http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=4808 1. Sniecinski, I, Seghatchian, J. Artificial intelligence: A joint narrative on potential use in pediatric stem and immune cell therapies and regenerative medicine. Transfus Apher Sci. 2018; 57(3):22–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2018.05.004. 2. Kaelin VC, Valizadeh M, Salgado Z, Sim JG, Anaby D, Boyd AD, et al. Capturing and Operationalizing Participation in Pediatric Re/Habilitation Research Using Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review. Front. Rehabil Sci. 2022; 3. https://doi. org/10.3389/fresc.2022.855240. 3. Martino S, Agbelie CM, Mei W, Morelli PJ Inclusion team science improves participation of children with disabilities in pediatric obesity programs. Disabil Health J. 2022; 15(1):101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101186. 4. Vishwanathaiah S, Fageeh HN, Khanagar SB, Maganur PC. Artificial Intelligence Its Uses and Application in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(3):788. https://doi. org/10.3390/biomedicines11030788 5. Visram S, Leyden D, Annesley O, Bappa D, Sebire NJ. Engaging children and young people on the potential role of artificial intelligence in medicine. Pediatr Res. 2023; 93: 440–444. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02053-4 6. Kaelin VC, Valizadeh M, Salgado Z, Parde N, Khetani MA. Artificial Intelligence in Rehabilitation Targeting the Participation of Children and Youth With Disabilities: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):e25745 https://doi. org/10.2196/25745. 7. Adegboro CO, Choudhury A, Asan O, Kelly MM. Artificial Intelligence to Improve Health Outcomes in the NICU and PICU: A Systematic Review. Hosp Pediatr, January 2022; 12 (1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2021-006094. 8. Ngombu S, Binol H, Gurcan MN, Moberly AC. Advances in Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Otitis Media: State of the Art Review. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery. 2023; 168(4):635–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998221083502. 9. Harel-Katz H, Carmeli E. The association between volition and participation in adults with acquired disabilities: A scoping review. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2019;32(2):84-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1569186119870022. 10. Steinhardt F, Dolva AS, Jahnsen R, Ullenhag A. Exploring two subdimensions of participation, involvement and engagement: A scoping review. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 2021; 29(6): 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2021.1950207. 11. Yoo PY, Mogo ERI, McCabe J, Bergthorson M, Elekanachi R, Cardoso R, et al. The Effect of Context-Based Interventions at the Systems-Level on Participation of Children with Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022; 42(5): 542–565.https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2051675. 12. Schachner T, Keller R, von Wangenheim F. Artificial Intelligence- Based Conversational Agents for Chronic Conditions: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e20701. https://doi.org/10.2196/20701. 13. Rahimi SA, Légaré F, Sharma G, Archambault P, Zomahoun HTV, Chandavong S, et al. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Community-Based Primary Health Care: Systematic Scoping Review and Critical Appraisal. J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e29839 https://doi.org/10.2196/29839. 14. Rahimi SA, Cwintal M, Huang Y, Ghadiri P, Grad R, Poenaru D, et al. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Shared Decision Making: Scoping Review. JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(8):e36199. https://doi.org/10.2196/36199. 15. Chew HSJ, Achananuparp P. Perceptions and Needs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care to Increase Adoption: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e32939. https://doi. org/10.2196/32939. 16. Gama F, Tyskbo D, Nygren J, Barlow J, Reed J, Svedberg P. Implementation Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence Translation Into Health Care Practice: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e32215. https://doi.org/10.2196/32215. 17. Beets B, Newman TP, Howell EL, Bao L, Yang S. Surveying Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care in the United States: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e40337 https://doi.org/10.2196/40337. 18. Xie B, Tao C, Li J, Hilsabeck RC, Aguirre A. Artificial Intelligence for Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Med Inform 2020;8(8):e18189. https://doi.org/10.2196/18189. 19. Bernauer SA, Zitzmann NU, Joda T. The Use and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review. Sensors. 2021; 21(19):6628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ s21196628. 20. Gerich HV, Moen H, Block LJ, Chu CH, DeForest H, Hobensack M, et al. Artificial Intelligence -based technologies in nursing: A scoping literature review of the evidence. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2022;127:104153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu. 2021.104153. 21. Guo Y, Hao Z, Zhao S, Gong J, Yang F. Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Bibliometric Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e18228. https://doi.org/10.2196/18228. 22. Frost EK, Bosward R, Aquino YSJ, Mayer AB, Carter SM. Public views on ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence: protocol for a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2022; 11 (142). https:// doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02012-4. 23. Dabas M, Schwartz D, Beeckman D, Gefen A. Application of Artificial Intelligence Methodologies to Chronic Wound Care and Management: A Scoping Review. Adv. Wound Care. 2023;12(4):205–240. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0144. 24. Fiske A, Henningsen P, Buyx A. Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy. J Med Internet Res 2019;21(5):e13216. https://doi.org/10.2196/13216. 25. Román-Belmonte JM, Corte-Rodríguez HD la, Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal conditions. Front. Biosci. (Landmark edition). 2021; 26(11):1340–1348.https://doi.org/10.52586/5027. 26. Agadi K, Dominari A, Tebha SS, Mohammadi A, Zahid S. Neurosurgical Management of Cerebrospinal Tumors in the Era of Artificial Intelligence : A Scoping Review. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023; 66(6): 632–641. https://doi.org/10.3340/ jkns.2021.0213. 27. Ma B, Yang J, Wong FKY, Wong AKC, Ma T, Meng J, et al. Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: A scoping review. Ageing Res. Rev. 2023; 83: 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. arr.2022.101808. 28. Gumbs AA, Frigerio I, Spolverato G, Croner R, Illanes A, Chouillard E, Elyan E. Artificial Intelligence Surgery: How Do We Get to Autonomous Actions in Surgery? Sensors. 2021; 21(16):5526. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165526. 29. Law J, Dornstauder M, Charlton J, Greaux M. Tele-practice for children and young people with communication disabilities: Employing the COM-B model to review the intervention literature and inform guidance for practitioners. Int. J Lang. Commun. Disord. 2021; 56(2):415–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460- 6984.12592. 30. Choi J, Woo S, Ferrell A. Artificial intelligence assisted telehealth for nursing: A scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231167613. 31. Bhatt P, Liu J, Gong Y, Wang J, Guo Y. Emerging Artificial Intelligence– Empowered mHealth: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(6):e35053. https://doi.org/10.2196/35053. 32. Brick R, Turner R, Bender C, Douglas M, Eilers R, Ferguson R, et al. Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on activity limitations and participation restrictions in older breast cancer survivors: A scoping review. J. Geriatr. Oncol. 2022; 13(2): 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2021.09.010. 33. Gehlot V, King D, Schaffer J, Sloane EB, Wickramasinghe N. Healthcare Optimization and Augmented Intelligence by Coupling Simulation & Modeling: An Ideal AI/ML Partnership for a Better Clinical Informatics. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022: 477-484. PMCID: PMC10148295 34. Shaffer KM, Tigershtrom A, Badr H, Benvengo S, Hernandez M, Ritterband LM. Dyadic Psychosocial eHealth Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020;22(3):e15509 https://doi.org/10.2196/15509. 35. Hatherly K, Glista D, Testani D, Brunton L, Cunningham BJ. A scoping review of virtual synchronous intervention studies in preschool rehabilitation. Disabil. Rehabil. 2022; 46(2): 232– 240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2157054.

Radiance Research AcademyInternational Journal of Current Research and Review2231-21960975-52411612EnglishN2024June30Life Sciences Efficacy of Psychological Counselling in India for Couples with Infertility During Art Treatment - A Systematic Review     English0714Saraswathi BhaskarEnglish K. NiraimathiEnglish Primary infertility is a major crisis, triggering negative impact on psychological aspects among couples in treatment. Globally, psychological counselling is advocated as a supportive model in alleviating psychological distress during Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment (ART). The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the available evidence from India on the effects of psychological counselling intervention among couples taking ART treatment due to primary infertility. A total of sixty-nine studies were identified from PubMed, Google scholar, Science Direct and electronic databases from the beginning of May 2022. Out of sixty-nine relevant articles, a total of five doctoral theses and one original article were systematically reviewed and included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five doctoral research work and one original article involving 2082 samples of primary infertile women and men were included for the present systematic review. All the reviewed studies have shown that infertile women and men in the intervention group experienced improvement in infertility related stress, depression, anxiety, coping ability and marital understanding. Overall, our finding suggests that there is not much research conducted in India to find the effect of psychological counselling. Due to the lack of pertinent studies from India, more indigenous studies with sound methodology are necessary to draw definitive conclusion about the need for psychological counselling during ART treatment. EnglishPsychological counselling/ intervention, Psychological distress, Assisted Reproductive Technology, Primary infertilityhttp://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=4809http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=4809 1. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356. 2. Naina P, Sharma H. Prevalence and potential determinants of primary infertility in India: Evidence from Indian demographic health survey. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021 Jan 1; 9:162–70. 3. Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Apr;21(2):293–308. 4. Pinborg A, Hougaard CO, Nyboe Andersen A, Molbo D, Schmidt L. Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2009 Apr;24(4):991–9. 5. Patel A, Sharma PSVN, Narayan P, Binu VS, Dinesh N, Pai PJ. Prevalence and predictors of infertility-specific stress in women diagnosed with primary infertility: A clinic-based study. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9(1):28–34. 6. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1520–4. Klonoff-Cohen H, Chu E, Natarajan L, Sieber W. A prospective study of stress among women undergoing in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001 Oct;76(4):675–87. 8. Rooney KL, Domar AD. The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):41–7. 9. Singh A, Dhaliwal L, Kaur A. Infertility in a primary health centre of north India: a follow-up study. J Fam Welf. 1996; 42:51–6. 10. Abbey A, Andrews FM, Halman LJ. Gender’s role in responses to infertility. Psychol Women Q. 1991;15(2):295–316. 11. Fertility counselling: Clinical guide and case studies. 2015. p. xiii, 333. 12. Manimekalai K, Poulpunitha D, Veeramani P. Infertility: An Alarming Situation in India. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2020 Dec 4; 9:2606–9. 13. Rohita C, Bikkina N. Fertility related qualify of life among women seeking assisted reproductive technologies. IAHRW Int J Soc Sci Rev. 2019;7(6):1800–5. 14. Csemiczky G, Landgren BM, Collins A. The influence of stress and state anxiety on the outcome of IVF-treatment: psychological and endocrinological assessment of Swedish women entering IVF-treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000 Feb;79(2):113–8. 15. Smeenk JMJ, Verhaak CM, Vingerhoets AJJM, Sweep CGJ, Merkus JMWM, Willemsen SJ, et al. Stress and outcome success in IVF: the role of self-reports and endocrine variables. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2005 Apr;20(4):991–6. 16. Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgård NG, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 28;5(1): e006592. 17. Zhou R, Cao YM, Liu D, Xiao JS. Pregnancy or Psychological Outcomes of Psychotherapy Interventions for Infertility: A Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 31; 12:643395. 18. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan— a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. 19. National Heart, Lungs, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Quality assessment of controlled intervention studies, 2013, NIH. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality- assessment-tools 20. Kharde SN. Effectiveness of a Therapeutic Counselling Intervention for Depression, Anxiety, Self Esteem and Marital Adjustment Among Infertile Women [dissertation]. [Karnataka, India]: KLE University; 2013. 21. Asifunisa S. Psychosocial Correlates and Effect of Psychological Intervention on Infertility Related Stress Psychological Well Being and Coping Strategies Among Women with Infertility [dissertation]. University of Madras; 2020 22. Vetriselvi V. A Study to Assess the Stress and Coping Among Women with Primary Infertility and To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Counselling and Relaxation Therapy Among the Couples with Primary Idiopathic Infertility Attending Infertility Clinic at Jipmer Pondicherry [dissertation]. Annamalai University; 2014 23. Nik MM. Effect of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) on depression and irrational beliefs among infertile women [dissertation]. University of Mysuru; 2012. 24. Saraswathi S. Effect of infertility counselling intervention on stress and depression of couples with primary infertility during IVF treatment [dissertation]. [Chennai, India]: University of Madras; 2020. 25. Kousalya K, Reddy S, Jayashree K. Assessment of Stress in Infertile Women and the Impact of Stress Management Counselling. Int J Med Sci. 2014;47(2):1539. 26. Stanton AL, Dunkel-Schetter C. Psychological Adjustment to Infertility. In: Stanton AL, Dunkel-Schetter C, editors. Infertility: Perspectives from Stress and Coping Research [Internet]. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1991 [cited 2024 Mar 26]. p. 3–16. 27. Greil AL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(11):1679–704.