<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xml><ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>Radiance Research Academy</PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Current Research and Review</JournalTitle><PISSN>2231-2196</PISSN><EISSN>0975-5241</EISSN><Volume>15</Volume><Issue>23</Issue><IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage><SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue><PubDate><Year>2023</Year><Month>December</Month><Day>16</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleType>Healthcare</ArticleType><ArticleTitle>&#xD;
	Retrograde Autologus Priming and its Effects on Intraoperative Transfusion&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
	&#xA0;&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
	&#xA0;&#xD;
&#xD;
</ArticleTitle><ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage><FirstPage>01</FirstPage><LastPage>05</LastPage><AuthorList><Author>Adnan Shah</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Mubashar Zareen Khan</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Attiya Hameed Khan</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Shahana Raza</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Kashif Anwar</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Abdul Nasir</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage></AuthorList><Abstract>&#xD;
	Introduction: Extreme haemodilution going on with cardiopulmonary pass imposes an vital chance element recollect for blood transfusion in cardiac surgical patients. Priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit with sufferers&amp;#39; own blood [retrograde autologous priming (RAP)] is a system used to restrict haemodilution and decrease transfusion requirements.&#xD;
	Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of Retrograde Autologus Priming on reducing intraoperative blood transfusion in cardiac surgery.&#xD;
	Methodology: It was cross sectional study, conducted over a period of six month from august 2021- February 2022 at Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, department of cardiac surgery. We enrolled one hundred and sixty patients, n= (160) through pre-structured Performa by the use of non-probability convenient sampling method technique.&#xD;
	Results: The mean age of the patients (8.77&#xB1;8.644), mean HB before surgery (13.443&#xB1;2.9020), after surgery (10.947&#xB1;2.0891), haematocrit after surgery (34.98&#xB1;7.697), priming volume (549.32&#xB1;229.013), effective priming volume (539.69&#xB1;257.563), extubation time (3.91&#xB1;1.255) and ICU stay was (2.20&#xB1;.875). Post-op performance HB level, hematocrit, priming volume, extubation time and ICU stay shows a significant association at p value </Abstract><AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage><Keywords>Retrograde Autologous priming, Congenital, Valvular, Cardiac Surgery, Haemodilution, Priming volume</Keywords><URLs><Abstract>http://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=4778</Abstract><Fulltext>http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=4778</Fulltext></URLs><References>&#xD;
	1. Swaminathan M, Phillips-Bute BG, Conlon PJ,. The association of lowest hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute renal injury after coronary artery bypasses surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76:784&#x2013; 791.&#xD;
	2. Ranucci M, Romitti F, Isgro ` G,. Oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass and acute renal failure after coronary operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80:2213&#x2013;2220.&#xD;
	3. KochCG, LiL, Duncan AI,. Morbidity and mortality risk associated with red blood cell and blood-component transfusion in&#xA0; isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1608&#x2013;1616.&#xD;
	4. Rosengart TK, DeBois W, O&#x2019;Hara M,. Retrograde autologous priming for cardiopulmonary bypass: a safe and effective means of decreasing hemodilution and transfusion requirements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115:426&#x2013;438.&#xD;
	5. Balachandran S, Cross MH, Karthikeyan S,. Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit reduces&#xA0; blood transfusion after coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73:1912&#x2013;1918.&#xD;
	6. Eising GP, Pfauder M, Niemeyer M,. Retrograde autologous priming:is it useful in elective on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75:23&#x2013;27.&#xD;
	7. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Nitsun M,. Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: safety and impact on pop.&#xA0;&#xA0;&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
	8. DeFoe GR, Ross GS, Olmstead EM,. Lowest hematocrit on bypass and adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass&#xA0; grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71:769&#x2013;76.&#xD;
	9. Swaminathan M, Philips-Bute BG, Conlon PJ, Smith PK,. The association of lowest hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute renal injury after coronary artery bypasses surgery.&#xD;
	Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76:784&#x2013;91.&#xD;
	10. Rosengart TK, Debois W, O&#x2019;Hara M, Helm R, Gomez M, Lang&#xA0;SJ et al. Retrograde autologous priming for cardiopulmonary bypass: a safe and effective means of decreasing hemodilution and transfusion requirements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115:426&#x2013;39.&#xD;
	11. Cormack JE, Forest RJ, Groom RC, Morton J,. Size makes a difference: use of a low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and autologous priming in small adults. Perfusion 2000; 15:129&#x2013;35.&#xD;
	12. Hou X, Yang F, Liu R, Yang J, Zhao Y, Wan C et al. Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit reduces blood transfusion in small adults: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Anaesth 2009;26: 1061&#x2013;66.&#xD;
	13. Severdija EE, Heijmans JH, Theunissen M, Maessen JG,. Retrograde autologous priming reduces transfusion requirements in coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion 2011;26: 315&#x2013;21.&#xD;
	14. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM,. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: a focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132:283&#x2013;290.&#xD;
	15. Panico FG, Neptune WB,. A mechanism to eliminate the donor blood prime from the pump oxygenator. Surg Forum 1960; 10:605&#x2013;609.&#xD;
	16. Shuhaiber JH. randomized prospective trial for blood transfusion during adult cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129:1200&#x2013;1201.&#xD;
	17. Hoppe JD, Scriba PC, Kluter H,. Cross-sectional guidelines for therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives (4th revised edition, 2008) - suspension of chapter 5 &#x2018;Human albumin. Transfuse Med Hemother. 2011;38(1):71.&#xD;
	18. Muller MM, Geisen C, Zacharowski K, Tonn T, Seifried E,. Transfusion of packed red cells: indications, triggers and adverse events. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29&#x2013;30):507&#x2013;17.&#xD;
	19. Schechtman E,. Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction,&#xA0; and the number needed to treat&#x2013;which of these should we use? Value Health. 2002; 5(5):431&#x2013;6.&#xD;
	20. Boer C, Meesters MI, Milojevic M, Benedetto U, Bolliger D, von Heymann C, Jeppsson A, Koster A, Osnabrugge RL, Ranucci M, et al. EACTS/EACTA guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesth. 2017;&#xD;
	21. Pagano D, Milojevic M, Meesters MI, Benedetto U, Bolliger D,. 2017 EACTS/ EACTA guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. J Cardiothoracic Vasc Anesth. 2018;32(1):88&#x2013;120.&#xD;
&#xD;
</References></Article></ArticleSet><ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>Radiance Research Academy</PublisherName><JournalTitle>International Journal of Current Research and Review</JournalTitle><PISSN>2231-2196</PISSN><EISSN>0975-5241</EISSN><Volume>15</Volume><Issue>23</Issue><IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage><SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue><PubDate><Year>2023</Year><Month>December</Month><Day>16</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleType>Life Sciences</ArticleType><ArticleTitle>&#xD;
	Production and Estimation of Plant Growth Regulators in Fungi Isolated from Western Ghats&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
	&#xA0;&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
	&#xA0;&#xD;
&#xD;
</ArticleTitle><ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage><FirstPage>06</FirstPage><LastPage>17</LastPage><AuthorList><Author>Praveen A</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Mrudula KV</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Devendrappa</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Karishma Laxman</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Sujatha B</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Anuradha M</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Sharad S. Achar</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage><Author> Suhasa G</Author><AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage></AuthorList><Abstract>&#xD;
	Introduction: The Rhizosphere is the narrow region of the soil tightly adhered to the plant root system and is under the influence of metabolites released by the associated soil microorganisms. Metabolites act as chemical messengers and attract motile microorganisms, representing a nutrient source to support their growth. These microorganisms are often called plant growth-promoting microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and cyanobacteria.&#xD;
	Aim/Objectives: The plant growth regulators were produced from the fungi obtained from Western Ghats. The potent PGPF was selected for HPLC and pot study analysis among the isolates obtained. Also, 18s rRNA sequencing was performed to identify the genetic similarities.&#xD;
	Methodology: Samples were collected from the rhizosphere of the Western Ghats region. They are used for isolation and partial identification of fungi. Later, organisms were subjected to IAA and GA determination up to 15 days. The estimated IAA and GA were subjected to HPLC analysis and compared with the standards. Further, the cultured filtrate of isolated organisms was tested for IAA and GA activity by performing pot analysis with Vigna radiata. The data obtained from pot studies was statistically analyzed. The potent isolated organism was further identified using molecular sequencing and bioinformatics tools.&#xD;
	Results: The isolated organisms were partially identified as species from Aspergillus, Rhizomucor, Fusarium, Cladosporium, and Trichoderma. Among the isolated organisms, Rhizomucor had the maximum concentration of IAA (15 days incubation), and a species of Rhizomucor and Fusarium had maximum GA (15 days incubation). The presence of IAA and GA was confirmed by comparing the standard peaks obtained from HPLC analysis. Pot study analysis showed an initial increase in shoot and root length from the 5th day onwards. Based on the statistical analysis, auxin root length showed significance at 95% interval levels. Compared with databases, the sequenced data had a 99.82% identity with Mucor irregularis.&#xD;
	Conclusion: Auxins and gibberellins produced by the isolated organisms enhanced the root and shoot length and thus can be chosen as bioinoculants.&#xD;
&#xD;
</Abstract><AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage><Keywords>Bioinoculants, Chemical fertilizers, HPLC, Metabolites, Auxins, Gibberellins</Keywords><URLs><Abstract>http://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=4779</Abstract><Fulltext>http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=4779</Fulltext></URLs><References>&#xD;
	Franche C, Lindstr&#xF6;m K, Emmerich C. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with leguminous and non-leguminous plants. Plant Soil. 2009;321:35&#x2013;59.&#xD;
	2. Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, Van Der Putten&#xA0; WH. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(11):789-99.&#xD;
	3. Chamkhi I, El Omari N, Balahbib A, El Menyiy N, Benali T, Ghoulam C. Is the rhizosphere a source of applicable multi-beneficial microorganisms for plant enhancement? Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022;29 (2):1246-59.&#xD;
	4. Hossain MM, Sultana F, Islam S. Plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF): phytostimulation and induced systemic resistance. In: Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives: Volume 2: Microbial Interactions and Agro-Ecological Impacts. 2017:135-191.&#xD;
	5. Osorio Vega NW. A review on beneficial effects of rhizosphere bacteria on soil nutrient availability and plant nutrient&#xD;
	uptake. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronom&#xED;a Medell&#xED;n. 2007;60(1):3621-3643.&#xD;
	6. Kumar D, Kumar M, Verma P, Shamim MD. Microbial biotechnology: role of microbes in sustainable agriculture. In: Plant Biotechnology. 2017. Volume 2. Apple Academic Press. p. 415-460.&#xD;
	7. Rademacher W. Plant growth regulators: backgrounds and uses in plant production. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2015; 34:845-872.&#xD;
	8. Iqbal N, Khan NA, Ferrante A, Trivellini A, Francini A, Khan MIR. Ethylene role in plant growth, development, and senescence: interaction with other phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci.&#xA0; 2017; 8:475-94&#xD;
	9. Saeed Q, Xiukang W, Haider FU, Ku?erik J, Mumtaz MZ, Holatko&#xA0; J, et al. Rhizosphere bacteria in plant growth promotion,&#xA0;biocontrol, and bioremediation of contaminated sites: A comprehensive review of effects and mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci.2021;22(19):10529.&#xD;
	10. Nagrale DT, Chaurasia A, Kumar S, Kumar SP, Hiremani NS, Raja S et al. PGPR: the treasure of multifarious beneficial microorganisms for nutrient mobilization, pest biocontrol, and&#xA0; plant growth promotion in field crops. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;39:100.&#xD;
	11. Malgioglio G, Rizzo GF, Nigro S, Lefebvre du Prey V, Herforth- Rahm&#xE9; J, Catara V, et al. Plant- microbe interaction in sustainable agriculture: the factors that may influence the efficacy of PGPM application. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2253.&#xD;
	12. Pieterse CM, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SC, Bakker PA. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014; 52:347-75.&#xD;
	13. Shoresh M, Harman GE, Mastouri F. Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010; 48:21-43.&#xD;
	14. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. Kenneth V. Thimann. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2023 August. [cited 2023 Nov 09] Available from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Kenneth- V-Thimann.&#xD;
	15. Kumar M, Chaudhary V, Sirohi U. Plant Growth Regulators and their Implication in Ornamental Horticulture: An Overview. IJAEB, 2021;14(03): 417-445.&#xD;
	16. Christie JM, Murphy AS. Shoot phototropism in higher plants: new light through old concepts. Am. J. Bot. 2013;100(1):35-46.&#xD;
	17. Fankhauser C, Christie JM. Plant phototropic growth. Curr Biol. 2015;25(9):384-9.&#xD;
	18. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. F.A.F.C. Went. Encyclopedia Britannica. Published 2023 July. [cited 2023 Nov 9]. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/F-A-FC- Went.&#xD;
	19. Bhatla SC, Lal AM, Bhatla SC. Auxins. Plant Physiology, Development and Metabolism. 2018; 569-601.&#xD;
	20. Barazani OZ, Friedman J. Effect of exogenously applied L-tryptophan on the allelochemical activity of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). J. Chem. Ecol. 2000; 26:343-349.&#xD;
	21. Keswani C, Singh SP, Cueto L, Garc&#xED;a-Estrada C, Mezaache- Aichour S, Glare TR, et al. Auxins of microbial origin and their use in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020; 104:8549- 8565.&#xD;
	22. Idris EE, Iglesias DJ, Talon M, Borriss R. Tryptophan-dependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects the level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007;20(6):619-626.&#xD;
	23. Tinega GM. Identification and molecular analysis of antimicrobial- resistant Salmonella isolates obtained from pigs slaughtered&#xA0; at Wambizzi abattoir in Uganda [dissertation]. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; 2015.&#xD;
	24. Lale GJ. Gibberellin production: strain improvement and process optimization in stirred tank reactor. 2014.&#xD;
	25. Gao L, Hao N, Wu T, Cao J. Advances in understanding and harnessing the molecular regulatory mechanisms of vegetable quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2022; 13:836515.&#xD;
	26. Hedden P, Thomas SG. Gibberellin biosynthesis and its regulation. Biochem. J. 2012;444(1):11- 25.&#xD;
	27. Anderson LL, Webster RK. A comparison of assays for Gibberella fujikuroi and their ability to predict resulting bakanae from seed sources in California. Phytopath. 2005;95(4):6.&#xD;
	28. Kar T, Say?n F, Celik S, Tunali Akar S. Attached culture of Gibberella fujikuroi for bio composite sorbent production and ciprofloxacin&#xA0; sequestration applications. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2021;96.&#xD;
	29. Bashyal Bishnu M &#x201C;Understanding the secondary metabolite production of Gibberella fujikuroi species complex in the genomic era.&#x201D; Indian Phytopathol. 2019;2019:1-11.&#xD;
	30. Praveena R, Srekha K, Revathy R, Srinivasan V, Sarathambal&#xA0;C, George P, et al. New rhizobacteria strains with effective antimycotic compounds against rhizome rot pathogens and identification&#xA0; of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides. Rhizosphere. 2022;22:100515&#xD;
	31. Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka AR, Marasinghe DS, Calabon MS,&#xA0;Gentekaki E, Lee HB, et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation, and preservation. Mycosphere. 2020;11(1):2678-2754.&#xD;
	32. Gang S, Sharma S, Saraf M, Buck M, Schumacher J. Analysis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in Klebsiella by LC-MS/ MS and the Salkowski method. Bio-protoc. 2019;9(9): e 3230-&#xD;
	40.&#xD;
	33. Bhuvaneshwari T, Tilak M, Kalaiselvi T, Shanmugam R. Scouting IAA producing ability of bacterial endophytes isolated from the plant parts of mulberry (Morus indica L.). Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2019;7(3):3043-3047.&#xD;
	34. Sharma S, Sharma A, Kaur M. Extraction and evaluation of gibberellic acid from Pseudomonas sp.: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem.2018;7(1):2790-2795.&#xD;
	35. Bhattacharyya C, Banerjee S, Acharya U, Aroni M, Ivy M, Anwesha H et al. Evaluation of plant growth promotion properties and induction of antioxidative defense mechanism by tea rhizobacteria of Darjeeling, India. Sci Rep. 2020; 10:15536.&#xD;
	36. Mashabela MD, Piater LA, Dubery IA, Tugizimana F, Mhlongo MI. Rhizosphere tripartite interactions and PGPR-mediated metabolic reprogramming towards ISR and plant priming: a metabolomics review. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(3):346.&#xD;
	37. Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Scott A Beatson. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 2011;12:402.&#xD;
	38. Kulkarni GB, Shrishailnath S, Sajjan, Karegoudar TB. Pathogenicity of indole-3-acetic acid- producing fungus Fusarium delphinoides strain GPK towards chickpea and pigeon pea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011; 131:355-369.&#xD;
	39. Bhalla K, Singh SB, Agarwal R. Quantitative determination of gibberellins by high-performance liquid chromatography from various gibberellins producing Fusarium strains. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009;167(1-4):515-20.&#xD;
	40. Gryganskyi NP, Golan J, Dolatabadi S, Mondo S, Robb S, Idnurm A et al. Phylogenetic and phylogenomic definition of Rhizopus species. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8(6):2007&#x2013;18.&#xD;
&#xD;
</References></Article></ArticleSet></xml>
