Radiance Research AcademyInternational Journal of Current Research and Review2231-21960975-52411518EnglishN2023September28Healthcare Functional Outcome of Arthrodesis by Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Malunited Fractures around Ankle Joint English0106Veer Abhishek GoudEnglish Sai Hari Prem BolleddulaEnglish Saniya MahdiEnglish Introduction: Ankle fractures are very common injuries to the ankle which generally occur due to a twisting mechanism and accounts for 10% of all fractures. Neglected ankle fractures are common in our regions. Patients first consult traditional healers and it is when the signs persist that they consult the surgeon for a swollen and painful ankle. In such condition, Arthrodesis becomes a versatile procedure. This can be done by screws, plating or nailing. Aim of the Study: The aim was to study the functional outcome of arthrodesis by cannulated cancellous screws in malunited fractures around the ankle joint. Methods and Materials: Study Design: Prospective observational clinical study Study Sample Size: This study includes 30 patients with ankle fractures which were malunited or mal-reduced and arthrodesis was performed with multiple cannulated cancellous screws. Center of Study: The study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Chalmeda Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences Study Period: Duration of study was from November 2019 to May 2023. Results: The outcome was evaluated using the visual analog pain scale and by American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hind foot Score. 80 percent patients achieved excellent results with mild complications, no pain after 9 months of procedure.13.3 percent cases had superficial skin infections, and 6.7 percent cases had deep wound infections. Conclusion: Hence, the present study concluded that arthrodesis with screw fixation is useful method for arthrodesis of ankle arthritis secondary to malunion. EnglishArthrodesis, Cannulated cancellous screws, Malunion, Ankle-Hind foot Score, Wound, Screws infectionshttp://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=4763http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=4763 1. Manke E, Yeo Eng Meng N, Rammelt S. Ankle Arthrodesis-A Review of Current Techniques and Results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87(4): 225-236. 2. Abidi NA, Gruen GS, Conti SF. Ankle Arthrodesis: Indications and Techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000; 8(3): 200-209. 3. Schmid T, Krause F, Penner MJ, Veljkovic A, Younger ASE, Wing K. Effect of Preoperative Deformity on Arthroscopic and Open Ankle Fusion Outcomes. Foot & Ankle Int. 2017; 38(12): 1301-1310. 4. Le V, Veljkovic A, Salat P, Wing K, Penner M, Younger A. Ankle Arthritis. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019; 4(3):1–16. 5. Bartoní?ek J, Rammelt S, Tu?ek M. Posterior malleolar fractures: changing concepts and recent developments. Foot Ankle Clin. 2017; 22 (1): 125–145 6. Briet JP, Hietbrink F, Smeeing DP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Verleisdonk EJ, Houwert RM. Ankle fracture classification: an innovative system for describing ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58 (3): 492–496 7. Smeeing DPJ, Houwert RM, Briet JP, Rolf Hendrik HG, Koen Willem WL, Luke PHL et al. Weight-bearing or non-weightbearing after surgical treatment of ankle fractures: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020; 46 (1): 121–130 8. Toth MJ, Yoon RS, Liporace FA, Koval KJ. What’s new in ankle fractures. Injury. 2017; 48(10):2035–2041. 9. Jantzen C, Ebskov LB, Andersen KH, Benyahia M, Rasmussen PB, Johansen JK. Ankle arthrosis Ugeskr Laeger. 2020 Oct 12; 182 (42): V04200244 https://europepmc.org/article/ med/33046192 10. Singh RA, Trickett R, Hodgson P. Early versus late surgery for closed ankle fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015; 23(3): 341–344. 11. Naumann MG, Sigurdsen U, Utvag SE, Stavem K. Associations of timing of surgery with postoperative length of stay, complications, and functional outcomes 3-6 years after operative fixation of closed ankle fractures. Injury. 2017;48(7):1662–1669 12. Fogel GR, Morrey BF. Delayed open reduction and fixation of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 215:187–195.

Radiance Research AcademyInternational Journal of Current Research and Review2231-21960975-52411518EnglishN2023September28Healthcare Orofacial Manifestations in Apert Syndrome: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature     English0712Mariem NefzaouiEnglish Imene JaziEnglish Jihene ZarouiEnglish Mohamed Ali ChemliEnglish Introduction: Apert syndrome (AS) is a craniosynostosis syndrome caused by mutations in the gene coding for the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2). It is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by a triad of clinical manifestations: craniosynostosis, facial dysmorphisms and syndactyly of the fingers and toes. Facial and oral abnormalities are common. Case Report: We reported a 5-year-old boy with genetically confirmed Apert syndrome. Clinical examination showed characteristic facial dysmorphism and oral manifestations. We performed a review of literature of orofacial findings in Apert syndrome. We focused on facial and oral manifestations. Results: Ten articles were reviewed. Facial findings reviewed were classified into four categories: Cranial features such as: frontal prominence, Flattened occiput, brachycephaly. Ophthalmologic abnormalities: Proptosis, Exorbitism, Hypertelorism. Nasal and earing abnormalities: Depressed nasal bridge, Bulbous nose, Low set ears.. and Front and profile view: Midface hypoplasia ,Concave profile, Cross bow-shaped lips. Syndactyly is a constant finding. Oral findings were classified into 3 categories: Maxilla features: high arched palatal vault, Pseudo-cleft. Malocclusion: teeth crowding, Retruded maxilla, Prognathic mandible, Anterior open bite, anterior and Posterior crossbite and other features, the most common of which are: delayed eruption and Poor oral hygiene. Conclusion: Typical dental and skeletal findings of Apert syndrome were observed upon extraoral and intraoral examination. Early dental check-up and management of AS is very important as a preventive option. EnglishApert syndrome, Acrocephalosyndactyly, Craniosynostosis, Oral manifestations, Dentofacial features, Abnormalities, Craniofacialhttp://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=4764http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=4764 1. Mohammad KA, Ahmed AA, Kumar CS, Deepti S, Kiran KG, Srinivas MM. Craniofacial morphology in Apert syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 5; 12(1):5708. 2. Partoune S, Masereel MC. [Apert syndrome or acrocephalosyndactilia type I]. Rev Med Liege. 2021 Oct; 76(10):715-718. 3. Andrea-Stacy LE, Miguel-Ángel RB, Socorro RR, Amaury PG, Ángel NF, Arturo GR. Dental approach for Apert syndrome in children: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Nov 1; 22(6):e660-e668. 4. Sannomiya EK, Reis SA, Asaumi.J, Silva JV, Barbara AS, Kishi K. Clinical and radiographic presentation and preparation of the prototyping model for pre-surgical planning in Apert’s syndrome. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Mar;35(2):119-24. 5. Azoury SC, Reddy S, Shukla V, Deng C. Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 ( FGFR2) Mutation Related Syndromic Craniosynostosis. Int J Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 2;13(12):1479-1488. 6. Kakutani H, Sato Y, Tsukamoto-Takakusagi Y, Saito F, Oyama A, Iida J. Evaluation of the maxillofacial morphological characteristics of Apert syndrome infants. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2017 Jan;57(1):15-23. 7. VaroliI FP, Santos II KCCP, Costa II C, Oliveira II JX. Apert syndrome: clinical and radiographic features and case report. Rev odonto ciênc. 2011;26(1). 8. Bhatia PV, Patel PS, Jani YV, Soni NC. Apert’s syndrome: Report of a rare case. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013 May;17(2):294-7. 9. Jose B, Emmatty TB, Methippara JJ, Kumar K, Thampi NM. Apert Syndrome: An Insight Into Dentofacial Features. Cureus. 2021 Sep 5;13(9):e17735. 10. Khan S, Chatra L, Shenai P, Veena K. Apert syndrome: a case report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5(3):203-206. 11. Koca TT. Apert syndrome: A case report and review of the literature. North Clin Istanb. 2016;3(2):135-139. 12. Kumar GR, Jyothsna M, Ahmed SB, Sree Lakshmi KR. Apert’s Syndrome. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(1): 69-72. 13. Kunwar F, Tewari S, Bakshi SR. Apert syndrome with S252W FGFR2 mutation and characterization using Phenomizer: An Indian case report. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2017;7(1):67-71. 14. Siminel MA, Neam?u CO, Di?escu D, For?ofoiu MC, Com?nescu AC, Novac MB et al. Apert syndrome - clinical case. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017; 58(1): 277-280. 15. Benmiloud S, Chaouki S, Atmani S, Hida M. Apert syndrome. [Article in French] Pan Afr Med J. 2013; 14:66. 16. Cammarata-Scalisi F, Yilmaz E, Callea M, Avendaño A, M?hç? E, Alper OM. Clinical and genetic findings of two cases with Apert syndrome. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2019; 76(1):44-48.

Radiance Research AcademyInternational Journal of Current Research and Review2231-21960975-52411518EnglishN2023September28Healthcare Dual and Non Dual Nature of Indian Philosophy and Planck’s constant as Soul in Human and Non Human English1316Ramesh BabooEnglish Introduction: It is found that after the death, the soul comes out like an invisible or immaterial from a Human or non-human body, there does not seem to be a reason for this to happen. Therefore, this creates an interest to know about the soul of human and non-human in terms of science. Aims/Objective: This study was done so that it can be known that human and non human have the same soul as given in Indian philosophy. Method: The facts given in Indian philosophy were analyzed from the point of view of science. The Upanishads, which are the essence of the Vedas, contain ideas about the soul. They were analyzed with assertion and reason. The facts of modern science and philosophy were compared together to find out the similarities and differences. Result: Sun’s spontaneous chemical reactions and energy generation, fills it with the quality of being alive. The age of the sun is calculated from the electromagnetic radiation emanating from it. Similarly, the calculation of human age is done by the electromagnetic radiation emitted by it. The Planck’s constant tells about the nature of the electromagnetic radiations. These electromagnetic radiations circulate the messages. These messages like thinking in brain or brain to brain speak and view by human brains are a type of electromagnetic radiations. Conclusion: So on behalf of above and evidences from Indian philosophy, the Planck’s constant from living to inert may be rendered as soul. EnglishEnergy, Electromagnetic Radiation, Planck’s constant, Indian Philosophy, Human Soul, Non-human Soulhttp://ijcrr.com/abstract.php?article_id=4765http://ijcrr.com/article_html.php?did=4765 1. Nature of Atma (28th Nov 2013) https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/religion/ nature-of-the-atma/article5400278.ece 2. Deussen P. Sixty Upanishads of the Veda; New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Back to cited text. 1997 (20), Vol 1; 389 3. Prasoon, Prof. SK. (1 January 2008). Indian Scriptures. Pustak Mahal. ISBN 978-81-223-1007-8. 4. Farquhar, John Nicol (1920), An outline of the religious literature of India, H. Milford, Oxford university press, p. 364, ISBN 81- 208-2086-X 5. Sharma S. 108 Upanishads Part 1 (in Hindi). Mathura, U.P.: Yuga Nirman Yojna. pp. 36–40. 2005. 6. Aiyer KN, “Laghu Yoga Vasistha” eng. trans., Thomson & Co., Madras, I896 and Hoe & Co., Madras, I9I4. 595-621 7. Besant A., Das B. The Bhagavad-Gita, Theosophical publishing society London and Benares; 1905, 34-35 8. Rukmani TS. Shankaracharya. Publications Division Ministry of Information & Broadcasting; 1994. 9. Sarma D. An Introduction to Madhva Vedanta. Routledge; 2017 Sep 29. 52. 10. SI Brochure: The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (9 ed.), BIPM, 2019, p. 127-128, retrieved 2020-01-12 11. Schrödinger E. What is life? With mind, matter, and autobiographical sketches. Cambridge University Press; 1992 Jan 31. 12. Montagnier L, Aissa J, Ferris S, Montagnier JL, Lavalléee C. Electromagnetic signals are produced by aqueous nanostructures derived from bacterial DNA sequences. Interdiscip Sci. 2009 Jun; 1:81-90. 13. Fioranelli M, Roccia MG. A BIonic model for exchanging waves between water and DNA. Int. J. of Geom. Methods in Mod. Phys. 2019 Apr 21; 16(04):1950051.