Welcome to IJCRR
Indexed and Abstracted in: Crossref, CAS Abstracts, Publons, Google Scholar, Open J-Gate, ROAD, Indian Citation Index (ICI), ResearchGATE, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, WorldCat (World's largest network of library content and services)
Responses (number of teachers) |
||||
|
|
F |
M |
T |
(i) |
Yes, this activity is fruitful for qualitative teaching because it will motivate the students to take part in discussion and activities which will develop their questioning skills leading to critical thinking skills, knowledge and experience regarding economic and social issues. It is based on the real situations. |
01 |
18 |
19 |
(ii) |
Yes, because through this, students could understand the social issues of our society and how much these issues were related to their daily life. |
01 |
02 |
03 |
|
Total |
02 |
20 |
22 |
Question 2: How does the activity reflect the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework 2005?
Table 2: Responses of teachers regarding reflection of the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework 2005 by this activity
Responses (number of teachers) |
||||
|
|
F |
M |
T |
(i) |
Yes. Because through this activity we can or student can understand the various economic and social issues and it will improve their all round development. |
02 |
17 |
19 |
(ii) |
Yes. The objective of real education and the way of implementation, the code and conduct etc were dealt very seriously. |
00 |
03 |
03 |
|
Total |
02 |
20 |
22 |
Question 3: How does this activity reflect the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education 2009?
Table 3: Responses of teachers regarding reflection of the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education (NCFTE) 2009 by this activity
Responses (number of teachers) |
||||
|
|
F |
M |
T |
(i) |
Yes. Activity will fulfill the aims and objectives of NCFTE 2009 i.e. knowledge based on understanding and application. |
02 |
15 |
17 |
(ii) |
Yes. NCFTE 2009 objective is to impart the basic idea among students. It is successfully achieved by the activities. |
00 |
05 |
05 |
|
Total |
02 |
20 |
22 |
Question 4: Would you recommend this method to other Economics teachers? Yes / No All teachers said yes.
Question 5: What constructive criticism you would like to offer to the resource person to improve the quality of activity? Give details.
All the teachers said that even though the activity based method was very effective, still more time should have been given for the detailed discussion and presentation. It will be effective if all are involved effectively.
Question 6: Activity was used for demonstration. Kindly rate this activity in terms of its objective, presentation and coverage of issues.
Table 4: Rating of activity in terms of objective, presentation and coverage of issues by teachers
Responses (number of teachers) |
||||
|
|
F |
M |
T |
(i) |
Not Satisfactory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(ii) |
Below Average |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(iii) |
Average |
0 |
01 |
01 |
(iv) |
Good |
01 |
15 |
16 |
(v) |
Excellent |
01 |
04 |
05 |
|
Total |
02 |
20 |
22 |
Question 7: How does the activity help you to make informed decisions in organizing your Economics classes?
Table 5: Rating of the activity in terms of making informed decisions in organizing Economics classes by teachers
Responses (number of teachers) |
||||
|
|
F |
M |
T |
(i) |
Not Satisfactory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(ii) |
Below Average |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(iii) |
Average |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(iv) |
Good |
01 |
18 |
19 |
(v) |
Excellent |
01 |
02 |
03 |
|
Total |
02 |
20 |
22 |
Question 8: Do you think that this activity "auctioning out event" will be able to increase the knowledge, application, presentation, analysis and overall personality of each and every student? If yes, why?
Table 6: Teachers responses regarding usefulness of "auctioning out event" for increasing the knowledge, application, presentation, analysis and overall personality of each and every student
Responses (number of teachers) |
||||
|
|
F |
M |
T |
(i) |
Yes, it gives the idea of a topic from different perspectives, all the learners get chance to clarify the doubts and also to give their opinion about the concept. |
01 |
18 |
19 |
(ii) |
Yes, it will increase the knowledge, application, presentation, analysis and overall personality development each and every learner by interaction, basic problems of students are solved, and it is easy to maintain each and every student's profile. |
01 |
01 |
02 |
(iii) |
Yes,
|
0 |
01 |
01 |
|
Total |
02 |
20 |
22 |
DISCUSSION
Teachers were unequivocal in their perception that the use of this activity had contributed to their learning. The study reveals that 86 per cent teachers responded that this activity is fruitful for qualitative teaching because it will motivate the students to take part in discussion and will develop their knowledge and experience regarding economic and social issues. It is based on the real situations. 14 per cent teachers responded that this activity is fruitful for qualitative teaching because through this, students could understand the social issues of our society and how much these issues were related to their daily life (Table 1). 100 per cent teachers responded that activity is fruitful for qualitative teaching. 86 percent teachers thought that activity reflects the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework 2005 because through activity we can or students can understand the various economic and social issues and it will improve their all-round development. 14 per cent teachers thought that activity reflect the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework 2005 because through activity, the objective of real education and the way of implementation, the code and conduct etc. were dealt very seriously (Table2).
18 per cent male teachers were of the view that activity reflects the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework 2005 because through activity, the objective of real education and the way of implementation, the code and conduct etc. were dealt very seriously. 100 per cent female teachers thought that activity reflects the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework 2005 because through activity, we can or students can understand the various economic and social issues and it will improve their all-round development.77 percent teachers thought that activity reflects the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education 2009 because will fulfill the aims and objectives of NCFTE 2009 i.e. knowledge based on understanding and application. 23 per cent teachers thought that activity reflects the concerns and perspectives of NCFTE 2009 because NCFTE 2009 objective is to impart the basic idea among students. It is successfully achieved by the activity based method (Table 3). 100 per cent female teachers thought that activity reflects the concerns and perspectives of National Curriculum Framework 2005 because through activity we can or students can understand the various economic and social issues and it will improve their all-round development. 100 percent teachers said that they will recommend this method to other Economics teachers. 100 percent teachers said that even though the activity was very effective, still more time should have been given for the detailed discussion and presentation. It will be effective if all are involved effectively. 72 percent teachers assessed that the use of activity is "good" in terms of objective, presentation and coverage of issues. 5 percent teachers assessed "average" in terms of objective, presentation and coverage of issues. 23 percent teachers assessed "excellent" in terms of objective, presentation and coverage of issues. 50 per cent female teachers assessed that the use of activity is "good" in terms of objective, presentation and coverage of issues. 50 per cent female teachers assessed that the use of activity is "excellent" in terms of objective, presentation and coverage of issues (Table 4). 86 percent teachers assessed that the use of activity is "good" in terms of making informed decisions in organizing Economics classes. 14 percent teachers assessed "excellent" in terms of making informed decisions in organizing Economics. 50 per cent female teachers assessed that the use of activity is "good" in terms of making informed decisions in organizing Economics classes. 50 per cent female teachers assessed that the use of activity is "excellent" in terms of making informed decisions in organizing Economics classes (Table 5).The study reveals that 86 per cent teachers responded that this activity is fruitful for qualitative teaching because it gives the idea of a topic from different perspectives, all the students get chance to clarify the doubts and also to give their opinion about the concept. 09 per cent teachers responded that this activity is fruitful for qualitative teaching because it will increase the knowledge, application, presentation, analysis and overall personality development each and every student by interaction, basic problems of students are solved, and it is easy to maintain each and every student's profile. 5 per cent teachers responded that this activity is fruitful for qualitative teaching because confidence will boost up. Participation in any activity of the school will be increased. All around development will be enhanced. 100 per cent teachers responded that auctioning out event is fruitful for qualitative teaching (Table 6).
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION (FGD)
The researcher organized focus group discussion with the teachers so that their true feelings may be recorded. The researcher asked following five questions:
What do you think about the traditional lecture method?
What do you feel about the activity based method which I used?
Do you think activity based method is better than lecture method? If yes, why and if no, why?
Will you ask the other subject teachers to teach with this method? If yes, why and if no, why?
Any other thing regarding the activity based method which you want to say, feel free to tell me.
Most of the teachers were of the view that the lecture method is not interesting and it does not motivate students to learn theory as it lacks real life situations, it is teacher centric, and some students felt isolated in the classroom.
98 percent teachers responded that the activity based method will help in motivating the students to learn theory and seek the required information.
97 per cent teachers responded that activity based method was better than lecture for retention and application of activity. Activities illustrate the practical application of theories and, most important, the relation between theories and practical results. 85 per cent teachers were of the opinion that the use of activities will enhance students' ability to recognize multiple perspectives.
95 per cent teachers told that they will ask the other subject teachers to teach with case method.
97 percent teachers told that activity based method is better than lecture method. It will create interest, motivate to learn and help students to relate the textual activity with the real life situations. Teachers believe that activities, when used along with lectures and readings will contribute more to the students learning.
The teachers provided qualitative feedback for improvement to the present level of learning of the teachers. Teachers were motivated by the researcher through activity based method and personal interactions.
The study supports that a better understanding of the structure of the activity will allow teachers to have more informed post-activity discussions and will provide insights about how to deal with anomalies that might arise. In this way, activities used to teach Economics will effectively demonstrate the economic way of thinking while engaging students in the process of learning Economics and classroom environment becomes co-operative and collaborative rather than individualistic and competitive as are also the findings of Mukunda (2009).
The rationale for using this methodology is that it helps students remember and apply abstract concepts; it is successful with students of different ability levels; it promotes social growth as well as economic understanding; and because it is fun, students are more interested in the subject matter as are also the findings of Lopus, Morton, and Willis, (2003).
CONCLUSION
The broad objective of this study was to differentiate and appreciate lecture vs activity based method. However, the findings of the study have ascertained and supported to the activity based method for better application/teaching by the researcher. Researchers experience with the activities in the classrooms as she began to use activity based method teaching reinforces teachers' observations and interests remarkably. From the point of view of a teacher, the classroom discussion that activities stimulate is highly rewarding. The use of activities is able to change the classroom environment from the passive listening of lectures and writing notes into the exchange of ideas. The evidence from the study suggests that the use of activities does more than stimulate academic discussion. The teachers take more interest and are motivated to teach the subject with the activities. They feel that the use of activities are interesting and adding interest to the subject and makes the classroom more real. Teachers believe that activities, when used along with lectures and readings, contribute more to students learning.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY
Training of teachers is the need of the hour. But the training should not be in mechanical way, it may have package-printed as well as audio visual that the teachers may see and co-construct the meaning and usefulness of activity based teaching methods.
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
This study was conducted among 22 PGTs of 9 subjects. So it can't be generalized that the activity based method will give the same result in another sample. It needs research in a large sample to make generalizations. However, some practicising teachers of KVS and NVS are also using this method and their responses are positive.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Author is obliged to the authorities of NCERT for providing the opportunity to interact with teachers as resource person on topic titled "Innovative Teaching-Learning Methods in Economics" in Capacity Building Programme for PGTs of CTSA in the area of Adolescence Education from 03-13 January, 2017. Author is grateful to Prof. A. K. Jain, BHU and Prof. V. Upadhyay IIT Delhi for their encouragement during writing process of this paper. Author acknowledges the immense help received from the scholars whose articles are cited and included in references of this manuscript. Author is also grateful to authors / editors / publishers of all those articles, journals and books from where the literature for this article has been reviewed and discussed. This paper has been presented in International Conference on Conscientious and Unimpeachable Technologies-2017 at SAITM Gurugram on 14th October, 2017.
References:
Indexed and Abstracted in
Antiplagiarism Policy: IJCRR strongly condemn and discourage practice of plagiarism. All received manuscripts have to pass through "Plagiarism Detection Software" test before forwarding for peer review. We consider "Plagiarism is a crime"
IJCRR Code of Conduct: To achieve a high standard of publication, we adopt Good Publishing Practices (updated in 2022) which are inspired by guidelines provided by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Disclaimer: International Journal of Current Research and Review (IJCRR) provides platform for researchers to publish and discuss their original research and review work. IJCRR can not be held responsible for views, opinions and written statements of researchers published in this journal.
International Journal of Current Research and Review (IJCRR) provides platform for researchers to publish and discuss their original research and review work. IJCRR can not be held responsible for views, opinions and written statements of researchers published in this journal
148, IMSR Building, Ayurvedic Layout,
Near NIT Complex, Sakkardara,
Nagpur-24, Maharashtra State, India
editor@ijcrr.com
editor.ijcrr@gmail.com
Copyright © 2024 IJCRR. Specialized online journals by ubijournal .Website by Ubitech solutions