Welcome to IJCRR
Indexed and Abstracted in: Crossref, CAS Abstracts, Publons, Google Scholar, Open J-Gate, ROAD, Indian Citation Index (ICI), ResearchGATE, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, WorldCat (World's largest network of library content and services)
|
Live Birth |
Couples having Female Child |
Couples having Male Child |
|||||
No. of couples |
No. per couple |
Total Live Birth |
No. of Couple |
No. per Couple |
Total No. |
No. of Couple |
No. per Couple |
Total No. |
159 |
1 |
159 |
119 |
0 |
0 |
112 |
0 |
0 |
134 |
2 |
268 |
156 |
1 |
156 |
169 |
1 |
169 |
31 |
3 |
93 |
48 |
2 |
96 |
46 |
2 |
92 |
6 |
4 |
24 |
9 |
3 |
27 |
5 |
3 |
15 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
||||||
1 |
6 |
6 |
||||||
332 |
|
555 |
332 |
|
279 |
332 |
|
276 |
169 couples had single male child, 46 had two, 5 had three male child and 119 couples had only male children in their family (Table 1).
On analysing the child birth status as per different combination of the mother and father mating, there were total 16 mating types among the 332 couples and maximum of 60 couples (18.07%) had B-B mating type and minimum of only two couples (0.60%) had AB-AB.
Table 2: Status of Live Birth in the different mating types of study population (n=555)
Mating Type |
No. of Couples |
Live Births |
Male |
Female |
O-O |
26 (7.83) |
45 (1.73) |
15 (33.3) |
30 (66.7) |
O-A |
21 (6.33) |
35 (1.67) |
16 (45.7) |
19 (54.3) |
O-B |
49 (14.76) |
81 (1.65) |
42 (51.9) |
39 (48.1) |
O-AB |
4 (1.20) |
6 (1.50) |
4 (66.7) |
2 (33.3) |
A-O |
22 (6.63) |
35 (1.59) |
18 (51.4) |
17 (48.6) |
A-A |
16 (4.82) |
27 (1.69) |
8 (29.6) |
19 (70.4) |
A-B |
30 (9.04) |
48 (1.60) |
26 (54.2) |
22 (45.8) |
A-AB |
5 (1.51) |
7 (1.40) |
5 (71.4) |
2 (28.6) |
B-O |
32 (9.64) |
53 (1.66) |
23 (43.4) |
30 (56.6) |
B-A |
26 (7.83) |
42 (1.62) |
25 (59.5) |
17 (40.5) |
B-B |
60 (18.07) |
108 (1.80) |
57 (52.8) |
51 (47.2) |
B-AB |
14 (4.22) |
22 (1.57) |
10 (45.5) |
12 (54.5) |
AB-O |
7 (2.11) |
11 (1.57) |
8 (72.7) |
3 (27.3) |
AB-A |
5 (1.51) |
9 (1.80) |
5 (55.6) |
4 (44.4) |
AB-B |
13 (3.92) |
23 (1.77) |
12 (52.2) |
11 (47.8) |
AB-AB |
2 (0.60) |
3 (1.50) |
2 (66.7) |
1 (33.3) |
Total |
332 |
555 (1.67) |
276 (49.7) |
279 (50.3) |
p value |
0.269 |
There were total 555 live births from 332 fertile couples including 279 females (50.3%) and 276 males (49.7%) with average of 1.67 births per mating in which B-B and AB-A had maximum rate of 1.80 each and lowest of 1.40 in A-AB mating type. (Table 2)
Among the different mating types, AB-O combination had maximum male child (72.7%) and A-A had maximum of female child (70.4%) and vice versa for the same. Overall sex ratio is 1.01 in the observed results. The results when tested for significance of association of different mating types with gender of the child born was found insignificant (p=0.269).
There were three types of mating combinations observed as far as the Rh phenotype of the couples was concerned i.e. Rh Neg. wife with Rh +ve husband (Group 1), Rh +ve wife with Rh +ve husband (Group 2) and Rh +ve wife with Rh Neg. husband (Group 3) having 22, 295 and 15 couples respectively. Male dominancy was observed in group 1 and female in group 2. The Rh-negative group was more prevalent in female partners than male partners. (Table 3).
Table 3: Live Birth Status and Rh Phenotype combinations of parents (n=332)
Group |
Rh Mating types |
No. of Couples |
Total Live Births |
Female |
Male |
1 |
Wife (-ve) + Hus (+ve) |
22 |
37 (1.68) |
16 (43.2) |
21 (56.8) |
2 |
Wife (+ve) + Hus (+ve) |
295 |
486 (1.65) |
248 (51.0) |
238 (49.0) |
3 |
Wife (+ve) + Hus (-ve) |
15 |
32 (2.13) |
15 (46.9) |
17 (53.1) |
|
Total |
332 |
555 (1.67) |
279 (50.3) |
276 (49.7) |
p value |
0.609 |
Table 4. Paternal phenotype and status of live birth in the study population (n=555)
Father's Phenotype |
No. of Couples |
Live Births |
Male |
Female |
O |
87 (26.2) |
144 (1.66) |
64 (44.4) |
80 (55.6) |
A |
68 (20.5) |
113 (1.66) |
54 (47.8) |
59 (52.2) |
B |
152 (45.8) |
260 (1.71) |
137 (52.7) |
123 (47.3) |
AB |
25 (7.5) |
38 (1.52) |
21 (55.3) |
17 (44.7) |
Total |
332 |
555 (1.67) |
276 (49.7) |
279 (50.3) |
p value |
0.368 |
Apparently on seeing the results from table 4 it was found that O type father had maximum female child i.e. 55.6% and AB type had maximum male child i.e. 55.3% and vice versa. But when tested statistically then it was found that phenotype of the father had no effect on the gender of the child born or we can say that gender of the child and phenotype of the father were both independent attributes (p=0.368).
Discussion:
On review the different literatures for association of blood group with different attributes like disease, personality, behaviour etc, we found that some of the studies established the association of blood group with these attributes at molecular level and some are based on the observations.
Blood Group and diseases:
Group A individuals rarely may acquire a B antigen from a bacterial infection that results in the release of a deacetylase enzyme. This converts N-acetyl-D-galactosamine into α- galactosamine, which is similar to galactose, the immunodominant sugar of group B, there by sometimes causing the red cells to appear to be group AB. In the original reported cases, five out of seven of the patients had carcinoma of gastrointestinal tract. Case reports attest to the danger of individuals with an acquired B antigen being transfused with AB red cells, resulting in a fatal haemolytic transfusion reaction following the production of hyperimmune anti-B. (1)
Table 5 Type of diseases associated with blood groups and their risk profile
S. No. |
Associated disease |
Risk Profile |
Blood group |
1 |
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin[7] |
Low |
O |
2 |
Basal cell carcinoma of skin[7] |
Low |
O |
3 |
Breast cancer[8] |
High |
O |
4 |
Cervix cancer [8] |
High |
B O |
5 |
Lung cancer[8] |
High |
B |
6 |
Buccal cancer[8] |
High |
B |
7 |
Ovarian cancer[9] |
High |
B |
8 |
Gastric cancer[10] |
High Low |
A O |
9 |
Pancreatic cancer[7,11] |
Low |
O |
10 |
Ischemic heart disease[12] |
High |
AB |
11 |
Otitis media with effusion[13] |
Low |
O |
12 |
Venous thromboembolism[14] |
High |
A,B,AB |
13 |
Malaria[14] |
Low |
O |
14 |
Cholera and GI infections by E.coli[14] |
High |
O |
15 |
Smallpox[14] |
High |
A |
16 |
Plague[14] |
Low |
O |
17 |
H.pylori infection andGI Ulceration[14] |
High |
O |
18 |
Diabetes mellitus type 2 (15) |
High |
B |
The inheritance of ABH antigens is also known to be weakly associated with predisposition to certain diseases. Group A individuals have 1.2 times the risk of developing carcinoma of the stomach than group O or B; group O individuals have 1.4 times more risk of developing peptic ulcer than non-group O individuals; and non-secretor of ABH have 1.5 times the risk of developing peptic ulcer than secretor. (4) The ABO group also affects plasma von Willebrand Factor (VWF) and Factor VIII levels, group O healthy individuals have level around 25% lower than those of other ABO groups. (5) ABO blood group appears to mediate its effect by accelerating clearance of VWF but the mechanism is not yet clear. (6) ABH antigens are also frequently more weakly expressed on the red cells of persons with leukaemia.
Table 5 shows the association of different diseases with different blood groups and their respective risk profile. From this table, it is apparent that risk profile of Cervix cancer, lung cancer, Buccal cancer and Ovarian cancer is high in B type phenotype. Risk of Squamous cell carcinoma of skin, Basal cell carcinoma of skin, Pancreatic cancer, malaria, otitis media, and plague was found low in O type and this group faces substantial risk of Breast cancer, cholera and GI infections by E. coli and infection by H. pylori and GI ulceration. Group A people are in high risk zone of Gastric cancer, venous thromboembolism and small pox and Group AB of IHD. Blood group B people are at elevated risk while individuals with blood group O are at low peril of evolving type 2 diabetes.
Not sufficient literature is available on this topic except the research work of Rex-Kiss B, who concluded that due to the feto-maternal blood group incompatibility the sex ratio of the newborn will be higher. The most probable explanation for this fact is that the feto-maternal blood group incompatibility exerts a negative effect on the X chromosome, in consequence of which the elimination rate of the zygotes fertilized by Y chromosome-carrying sperms decrease and thus the sex ratio will be higher. The highest sex ratio was found among the D-negative new born of D-positive mothers (172.7), whereas the lowest one among the D-positive children of D-positive mothers (113.5). The incompatibility existing in the other antigens of Rh-system and in the ABO-system also elevated the sex ratio to a minor degree.(16)
Conclusion:
It was concluded from the observations that different mating types of the parents and paternal phenotype has no effect on the gender of the child born. As no such study is available for reference which indicates any association of parental phenotype with the gender of the child. So, there is further scope of research on this topic with much bigger study population. These results may help the researchers in the genetic and anthropology related studies and to understand the inheritance related issues.
Acknowledgement:
Authors acknowledge the immense help received from the scholars whose articles are cited and included in references of this manuscript. The authors are also grateful to authors/editors/publishers of all those articles, journals and books from where the literature for this article has been reviewed and discussed.
Conflict of Interest:No
Source of Funding: No
References:
Indexed and Abstracted in
Antiplagiarism Policy: IJCRR strongly condemn and discourage practice of plagiarism. All received manuscripts have to pass through "Plagiarism Detection Software" test before forwarding for peer review. We consider "Plagiarism is a crime"
IJCRR Code of Conduct: To achieve a high standard of publication, we adopt Good Publishing Practices (updated in 2022) which are inspired by guidelines provided by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
Disclaimer: International Journal of Current Research and Review (IJCRR) provides platform for researchers to publish and discuss their original research and review work. IJCRR can not be held responsible for views, opinions and written statements of researchers published in this journal.
International Journal of Current Research and Review (IJCRR) provides platform for researchers to publish and discuss their original research and review work. IJCRR can not be held responsible for views, opinions and written statements of researchers published in this journal
148, IMSR Building, Ayurvedic Layout,
Near NIT Complex, Sakkardara,
Nagpur-24, Maharashtra State, India
editor@ijcrr.com
editor.ijcrr@gmail.com
Copyright © 2023 IJCRR. Specialized online journals by ubijournal .Website by Ubitech solutions