IJCRR - 3(6), June, 2011
Pages: 49-57
Print Article
Download XML Download PDF
PRE-FORMULATION ASSESSMENT: FRUIT OF CUMINUMCYMINUM, LINN.
Author: Shanthi.A, R. Radha
Category: Healthcare
Abstract:Cuminumcyminum, (Linn.)Correa; belonging to the familyUmbelliferaeis commonly known as Cumin (Eng.) and Jira (Hindi). It is a glabrous, annual herb. Cultivated as a cold season crop on the plains and as summer crop on the hills in Northern India, a native of west Asia. It has the traditional value for curing various ailments like Asthma, fever, skin diseases, leprosy and also as a helminthiasis. This traditionally useful part (fruit) was standardized based on the pharmacognostic, physico-chemical and chromatographic conditions. Quality assessment by determining the limits of Microbials, heavy metals, pesticides and Aflatoxin as per WHO guidelines. The report states that the sample taken was standard under AyurvedicPharmacopoeial limits and WHO. The preliminary phytochemical screening confirms the presence of Essential oils, Glycosides, sterols and proteins. HPTLC finger print states the presence ofN nine different constituents and determination of total volatile oil content by Gas chromatography was found to be about 0.887%w/w. From this the report confirms that the sample was standard enough to use in the developing a herbal formulation.
Keywords: Cuminumcyminum, standardization, phytochemical screening, chromatographic identification and total volatile oil estimation by GC
Full Text:
INTRODUCTION
Herb is a plant that is valued for flavor, scent, medicinal or other qualities other than its food value1 . Over the last few years, researchers have aimed at identifying and validating plant derived substances for the treatment of various diseases. Interestingly, it is estimated that more than 25% of modern medicines are directly or indirectly derived from plants2 . With the emerging interest in the world to adopt and study the traditional system and to exploit their potentials based on different health care systems, the evaluation of the rich heritage of the traditional medicine is essential3 .The general standardization protocols to determine the percentage of active medicaments could not be followed for Ayurvedic herbal preparations. The procedures have to be modified in order to make the preparation safe. The approach has to be made from raw materials to finished products evaluation for the successful outcome. Which include the standardization of rawmaterial. The drugs of plant origin especially of herbaceous nature are identified with their origin, common name, scientific nomenature,family, geographical source, cultivation, collection, preservation, storage, macroscopy,microscopy, chemical composition, identity, purity, strength and assay, substitute andadulterants etc., The microscopic examination of root which includes Transverse sectionand Longitudinal section are made for identification4 . Cuminumcyminum is commonlyknown as ?Cumin‘ cultivated as a cold season crop on the plains and as summer crop on the hills in Northern India, a native of west Asia and Cultivated throughout India. Cumin is one of the constituents of siddha preparation Attalicuranam5 . The ripe fruits have been used traditionally for curing various ailments like Asthma, fever, skin diseases, leprosy and also as a helminthiasis6 . And it also used in neurological disorders7 , anti-depressant effects8 . The present work was based on the standardization of Cuminumcyminum fruit as per WHO guidelines9 . The complete standardization of this variety may be used for formulation development in future.
EXPERIMENTAL PART
1) Chemicals and reference drugs:
All the chemicals used in this present work were analytical grade in nature. The chromatographic estimations were done in the Asthagiri Herbal Research Foundation (Chennai) are chromatographic grade.
2) Collection of plant materials:
The roots of Cuminumcyminum were provided by M/S AnnaiAravindHerbals,Chennai. The sample was taken for authentication.
3) Macroscopic evaluation:
Organoleptic characters like colour, odour, taste, size, shape and other characters can be identified entirely or it fragment. This is authentication of crude drug with its genuine varierty10 .
4) Microscopic evaluation:
The microscopic appearance of the drug both in section view and in powdered form for its authentication with its genuine variety was performed11 .
5) Determination of foreign matter:
About 100g of the drug sample was spread out on a thin layer. The foreign matter was detected by inspection, separated and weighed. And the percentage of foreign matter was calculated12 .
6) Determination of total ash:
About 2g accurately weighed drug was incinerate in a tarred silica dish at a temperature not exceeding 4500 c until free form carbon, cooled and weighed. The percentage of ash obtained was calculated with reference to the air-dried drug13 .
7) Determination of acid-insoluble ash:
Total ash obtained boiled for 5 minute with 25ml of dilute hydrochloric acid; insoluble matter was collected in a Gooch crucible, or an ash less filter paper, again washed with hot water and ignited to constant weight. The percentage of acid-insoluble ash was calculated with reference to the air dried drug.
8) Determination of water soluble ash:
The ash obtained was boiled for 5 minutes with 25ml of water; insoluble matter was collected in a Gooch crucible or on an ash less filter paper, wash with hot water, and ignited for 15minutes at a temperature not exceeding 4500 c. The weight of the insoluble matter obtained was subtracted from the weight of the ash; the different in the weight represents the watersoluble ash. The percentage of water-soluble ash was calculated with reference to the air-dried drug.
9) Determination of alcohol soluble extractive:
About 5g of the air-dried drug was coarsely powdered and macerated with 100ml of Alcohol (specified strength) in a closed flask for 24hours, shake frequently during 6hours and allowed to stand for 18hours. Filtered rapidly, taking precautions against loss of solvent and evaporated 25ml of the filtrate to dryness in a tarred flat bottomed shallow dish, and dried at 1050C to constant weight and weighed. The percentage of alcohol soluble extractive was calculated with reference to the air-dried drug.
10) Determination of water soluble extractive:
About 5g of the air-dried drug was coarsely powdered and macerated with 100ml of Chloroform water in a closed flask for 24hours, shake frequently during 6hours and allowed to stand for 18hours. Filtered rapidly, taking precautions against loss of solvent and evaporated 25ml of the filtrate to dryness in a tarred flat bottomed shallow dish, and dried at 1050C to constant weight and weighed. The percentage of alcohol soluble extractive was calculated with reference to the air-dried drug.
11) Determination of moisture content (loss on drying)
About 10 g of the drug accurately weighed and place in a tarred evaporating dish and dried at 1050 c for 5 hours, and weighed. The drying and continued and weighed at 1hour interval until difference between two successive weighing corresponds to not more than 0.25 percentage is achieved.
12) Quality parameters:
Limit test for microbial limits: Microbial limits were detected for Total aerobic count, Total bacterial count, Total Yeast and moulds, Test for Escherichia Coli, Salmonella species, Psueudomonasaerugenosa, Staphyllococusaureus and Aflatoxins14 .
13) Pesticide residue:
A pesticide is any substance or mixture of substance intended for preventing, destroying or controlling any pest. Chromatographic estimation can be used for detecting and quantifying the pesticide limits in the crude drug was detected15 .
14) Determination of heavy metals:
The test for heavy metals is designed to determine the content of metallic impurities that are coloured by Sulphide ion, under specified conditions. The limit for heavy metals is indicated in the individual monograph in terms of parts of lead per million of substance (by weight). It includes the limit test for Arsenic, Lead, Mercury, and Cadmium16 .
15) Preliminary phytochemical screening:
Preliminary phytochemical screening for alkaloids, glycosides, tannins, terpenoids, phenols, sterols, proteins, amino acids, volatile oils, flavonoids, saponins, fixed oils, essential oils, coumarins, sugars and others17
16) Study of colour change under UV light:
The powdered drug was studied for any colour change under UV light. The sample was divided into three parts and each was studied under ordinary light, short UV (254nm) and long UV (356nm). First part is observed as such, second part observed after treating with 50% Hydrochloride acid, and third part observed after treating with 50% Sodium hydroxide18 .
17) Chemical identity: TLC analysis of plant drugs19
. About 4g of the sample was soaked in chloroform for 18 hours, boiled, filtered and concentrated to 10ml in standard flak. 20Pl of the sample was applied on the Merck aluminium plate pre-coated with silicagel 60 F254 of 0.2mm thickness and the plate was developed in water: Aceto nitrile: methanol: ethyl acetate: hexane (1.5:5.0:0.5:1.5:1.5). The plate was dried and photographed under UV 254 and 366nm.
HPTLC fingerprint:
A Cammag HPTLC system equipped with a sample applicator Linomat IV, twin trough plate development chamber, TLC SCANNER II and Wincats used as an integration software 4.02 (Switzerland). TLC aluminium plates pre-coated with silica gel 60 F 254 (10x10cm, 0.2mm thick) were used. The estimation has been done using the following chromatographic conditions. The plate was dried and scanned at 200 -450nmusing Deuterium lamp the finger prints was developed.
18) Quantitative estimation:
Volatile oil determination was carried out by Gas chromatography. It is an excellent tool for the separation, characterization and quantitative estimation of volatile component of essential oil containing drugs. The identity of the components was assigned by comparing their GC retention times with those of authentic samples, as well as of the components of other essential oils. GC was performed on a Varian gas chromatograph, model cx-3400, under the following conditions: carrier gas, hydrogen; injector and detector temperatures, 2208C and 2258C, respectively; using a capillary column (Supelcowax-10, 30 m _ 0.3 mm), with oven temperature programmed from 808C at 58C/min to 1508C, then at 78C/min to 2158C20 .
RESULTS
1. Authentication of the plant material:
Plant part used was authenticated by Prof. P. Jayaraman, National institute of herbal sciences, West Tambaram, Chennai. The voucher no: PARC/2010/660.
2. Determination of foreign matter:
Foreign matters were present in less than one percentage (Limit NMT 2%) the value was obtained from the triplicate of the analysis.
3. Macroscopic evaluation:
Type: Cremocarp.
Colour: brown with light coloured ridges.
Odour:Umbelliferous characteristic.
Taste: Spicy. Size: 4-6 m long, 2 mm wide.
Shape: Ellipsoidal, elongated, tapering at both ends.
Extra features: Lateral: Slightly compressed.
Ridges: 5 primary and 4 secondary ridges. The macroscopic image was given in Fig 1: Cuminumcyminum fruit.
4. Microscopic evaluation:
a. Transverse section:
It shows Outer epidermis: polygonal cells
Testa: brown coloured polygonal cells, bundles of lignified sclerenchymatous fibres
Inner epidermis: polygonal cell - regularly arranged.
Mesocarp: few layer of parenchyma with five vascular bundles - primary ridges and 6 vittaes under secondary ridges (4dorsal side, 2 on commissural surface).
Endocarp: polygonal cells with fixed oils, aleurone grains and rosette of calcium oxalate crystals, fibres in carpophore. Fig 2: Transverse section of Cuminumcyminum fruit. b. Powder:
Colour - Brown
Endosperm cells -Aleurone grains, fixed oil, calcium oxalate crystals.
Fragments of testa: brown polygonal cells.
Mesocarp: Fibrovascular elements, thick walled sclerenchymatous cells and large oil ducts.
Vessels - annular spiral thickening
Fig 3: Microscopy ofCuminumcyminum fruit.
5. Physico-chemical constants
The table No: 1 shows that the mean valueof physical constants such as LOD, Ash values and extractive values. The report shows the presence of above values within the limits prescribed under Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, and the sample contain high proportion of water and alcohol soluble constituents.
6. Microbial determination:
The table No: 2 shows the presence of microbial limits of the sample. And the report shows that as per the WHO standards, the plant material is free from microbial load and ranges within the standard limit and the Aflatoxin. And it was found to be safe for further use in formulation development.
7. Determination of pesticide
Pesticide analysis of the raw material states that the DDT, Benzene hexa chloride, Aldrin, Dialdrin, Lindane, Chloropurophos and Enoculphan type of pesticides are not detected in the drug sample. ND - not detected (concentration less than the minimum detection limit even in ng/l units). From the above results it can be concluded that the plant material is totally safe and there is no traceable limit of pesticide in them.
8. Quality parameters:
The table No: 3 shows the presence of heavy metal limits of the sample. The report shows that the raw material is free from Arsenic, Cadmium and Mercury and Lead is present within the standard limits.
9. Preliminary phytochemical screening:
Preliminary phytochemical screening indicates the presence of Essential oils, Glycosides, sterols and proteins.
10. Study of colour change under UV light:
The table No: 4 represents the colour change of the sample under normal, long and short UV. Colour change was observed under ordinary light with acid and alkali medium with respect to powder alone and in short UV only in alkaline medium the colour change was observed and there was no change in colour was observed under long UVregion.
11. Chemical identity:
The table No. 5 indicates the Rf values obtained for the sample and the number of constituents identified with that respective Rf values. The figure 3 gives the TLC image and the figure 4 gives the HPTLC finger print data. The result obtained from the HPTLC studies showed that, therewere nine spots were observed.
12.Quantification
: The total volatile oil content of the Cumimuncyminumfruit estimated by Gas Chromatography method was found to be about 0.887% w/w.
DISCUSSION
The macroscopic and the microscopic evaluation of drug establishing its quality control profile and according to WHO, botanical standardswere proposed as a protocol for the diagnosis. The physic-chemical constants were lies within the AyurvedicPharmacopoeial limits states that the sample is free from adulterants and the quality evaluations for microbial, heavy metals states that they were present with in the WHO limits and the preliminary phytochemical evaluation states the presence of secondary metabolites and the HPTLC finger print reveals the number of constituents present and the quantification report states the purity of the sample based on the quantity of phytoconstituents.
CONCLUSION
The reports states that the Cumimuncyminumwas authenticated based on its pharmacognostic, physico-chemical and phytochemical aspect. And the qualitative estimation impliessafety of the sample due to the absence of heavy metals, pesticides and microbes. Quantitative estimation states the therapeutically useful constituent (volatile oil) is present in it.Thus the Cumimuncyminum is valid for its therapeutic potency.And thus it can be used in the herbal formulation development.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the supporters those who are directly and indirectly participated in presenting this work for publication and also supported for carrying out the above research work.And special thanks to Dr. A. Kannan, Asthagiri Herbal Research Foundation for his timely help in completing the HPTLC analysis. Funding source: Nil.
![](https://ijcrr.com/admin/public/uploads/1/myfiles/1_1511411681251.PNG)
![](https://ijcrr.com/admin/public/uploads/1/myfiles/1_1511411701537.PNG)
![](https://ijcrr.com/admin/public/uploads/1/myfiles/1_1511411719749.PNG)
References:
1. Herb form -Dictionary.com?. (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/herb . Retrieved 2007-12-19.
2. CraggGM, NewmanDJ, SanderKM.Natural products in drug discovery and development. Journal of Natural Products 1997; 60: 52-60.
3. Mukherjee PK. Evaluation of Indian Traditional Medicine. Journal of Drug Information 2002; 35: 631-640
4. Quality control manual for Ayurvedic, Siddha and Unani medicine, Government of India, Department of Ayush,2010. P. 14-15.
5. The Wealth of India, A Dictionary of Indian raw materials and industrial products 2002; (2 suppl1): 257.
6. Dinesh Jadhav. A guide to Ayurvedic and Ethnomedicinal uses of plants, Medicinal plants of India, 2008; 1.P.81.
7. Kulkarni SK, DhirA. An overview of curcumin in neurological disorder, Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences2010; 72(2): 149 -154.
8. Kulkumi S, Dhir A. Potentials of curcumin as a potential anti-depressant, scientific world journal 2009; 9: 1233 - 41.
9. Sapnashrikumar, Uma maheshwari M, Suganthi A, Ravi TK. WHO guidelines for Herbal Drug Standardization. Pharmainfo.net 2004; 2: dated 09/19/2004.
10. The Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India, part –I, volume II, 1stedi, 1999: 106.
11. Quality control methods for medicinal plants, WHO Geneva, A.I.T.B.S. Publishers 2002: 10.
12. The Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India. Part-I, Volume-III, First Edition.P. 234.
13. Pulok K. Mukherjee. Quality control of herbal drugs - An approach to evaluation of Botanicals. New Delhi: Business Horizons Pharmaceutical Publishers. 2002.
14. Sharma AK, Gaurav SS, Balkrishna A. A rapid and simple scheme for the standardization of polyherbal drugs. International journal of Green Pharmacology 2009; 3: 134 - 140.
15. Smith Andrew G. Chlorinated Hydrocarbom Insecticides. In: Wayland JH, Edward RL(eds) Hand book of pesticide toxicology, San Diego; Academic Press Inc; 1991 (vol.2). 16.
16. Department of Ayush. Permissible limit of heavymetals in Ayurveda, Siddha and Unani medicines with only herbal ingredians.
17. Kokate CK.Purohit AP. Gokhale SB. Practical pharmacognosy2000 (4th edi). P. 108-109.
18. Kokoski CJ, Kokoski RJ, Slama FJ.Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs under Ultraviolet radiation, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc 1958; 47: 715 -717.
19. Wagner H, Bladt S. Plant drug analysis - A Thin layer chromatography Atlas. 2ndedi. Tokyo: Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2002.
20. Ghulam A,Shabir. Method development and validation for the GC-FID assay of Pcymene in tea tree oil formulation. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical Analysis 2005; 39(3): 681 - 684.
|