IJCRR - Vol 04 issue 13, July, 2012
Date of Publication: 18-Jul-2012
Download XML Download PDF
EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FIXED DOSE COMBINATION OF CEFIXIME AND OFLOXACIN (CO2 TABLET) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
Author: Arif A. Faruqui, Wasim Siddique
Abstract:Acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) range from acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis to pneumonia. Among these, pneumonia represents the most frequent cause of mortality, hospitalisation and medical consultation. Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fixed dose combination of Cefixime and Ofloxacin (CO2 Tablet) in the management of Respiratory tract infection a post marketing surveillance study was carried out among 215 patients of age group 18-72 years suffering from respiratory tract infection. Materials and Method: Study drug CO2 (Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Mumbai) containing Cefixime 200 mg + Ofloxacin 200 mg was prescribed to be taken twice daily for a duration of 7-14 days depending upon the severity. Cough intensity, frequency of cough, fever and respiratory rate were recorded during three visit on 3rd, 7th and 14th day of treatment. Safety and efficacy was evaluated based on the global assessment by the investigator based on a three
point scale marked as excellent /good/poor. Result: 93.95% patients reported fever on the first day of treatment. Body temperature was significantly reduced from baseline mean value 101\? 0.49 \?F to 99.72\?
0.09\?F, 98.18 \? 0.142 and 97.95 \? 0.161 on 3rd, 7th and 14th day respectively. Similarly the cough intensity was significantly reduced on: 3rd, 7th and 14th day from baseline. On day 3rd cough intensity was reduced by 29.4% (p< 0.0001), on the day 7th cough intensity was reduced by 58.90% (p< 0.0001) and on 14th day it was further reduced by 79.63% (p< 0.001) from the base line. There were repeated bouts of cough at the time of diagnosis; mean \? SD value was 15.59 \? 11.65 at base line. On day 3rd, number of bouts of cough was reduced to (10.6\?8.7 vs. 15.5 \? 11.6) (p< 0.05), on 7th day it was reduced to (5.804\?5.707 vs. 15.59 \? 11.65) (p< 0.05) from the base line and on the 14th day of treatment it was reduced to (2.024\?3.751 vs. 15.59 \? 11.65) (p< 0.05). On 14th day almost all the patients were devoid of bouts of cough. As per investigators assessment, 98 % of patients reported good to excellent and 2 % reported poor efficacy. As per investigators assessment about safety of CO2 97.9% of patient reported good to excellent and 2.1% reported poor tolerability. Rare incidences of headache and nausea were reported. No serious adverse events were reported which led to withdrawal of patients from the study. Conclusion: In conclusion this postmarketing surveillance study of fixed dose combination of cefixime and ofloxacin (CO2 Tablet) antibiotic therapy achieves a better outcome for the empirical management of
respiratory tract infection with excellent efficacy, tolerability and safety in the treatment of respiratory tract infection
Keywords: LRTI, Pneumonia, Bronchitis, Cefixime, Ofloxacin and CO2
Acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) range from acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis to pneumonia. Approximately five million people die from acute respiratory tract infections annually. Among these, pneumonia represents the most frequent cause of mortality, hospitalisation and medical consultation1 . Antimicrobial treatment in LRTI has to be effective, partly because of the need to reduce the cost and also the problem of increasing resistance to the commonly used antibiotics2 . It has also been suggested that the start of therapy should not be delayed for longer than six hours for diagnostic studies3 . Compliance is also important, particularly in outpatient patients. A study related to medical compliance for the outpatient management of infectious diseases indicated that there was an inverse relationship between frequency of dose and compliance. The most common symptom is cough, which is new or changed in character. Other symptoms include sputum production, breathlessness, wheezing, chest pain, fever, sore throat and coryza. Distinguishing pneumonia from non-pneumonic lower respiratory tract infection in the community is also difficult, particularly without diagnostic radiology. So the empirical therapy is required with the combination of antibiotics with wider range of spectrum. There is currently no general agreement on the definition of an exacerbation in COPD. A commonly used definition is based on an increase in symptoms of dyspnoea, sputum volume and sputum purulence with or without symptoms of upper respiratory infection. Bacteria are isolated from between 40-60% of acute exacerbations of COPD. Since RTI involves more than one pathogen, so combination of antibiotic with wider spectrum of activity is suitable option for empirical therapy. As shown in Table 1. Following are the microorganisms that are frequently found in respiratory tract infection4
A wide array of organisms may cause acute pneumonia and published reports vary in the organisms isolated due to differences in patient groups, presence of epidemic organisms and diligence of the investigation. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most frequently identified pathogen in CAP. Other organisms commonly reported include Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae and influenza viruses. Common pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae may exhibit more resistance to common antibiotics5 .
MATERIALS AND METHOD
The post marketing surveillance study was a nonrandomized, open, non-comparative, multi centric and the drug CO2 tablet (Fixed dose combination of Cefixime 200 mg and Ofloxacin 200 mg, Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Mumbai) was administered to patients suffering from respiratory tract infection for duration of 7-14 days. Informed consent was obtained from the patients and the post marketing surveillance was in accordance with the clinical principles laid down in declaration of Helsinki. 279 subjects were monitored across India.
Patients of either gender 18 years or more willing to give informed consent were included. Clinical criteria included cough, sputum volume, and dyspnea. Patients were excluded from entry into the study if they had a known/suspected history of hypersensitivity to any of the antibiotic, hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, and known cases of hepatic or renal insufficiency, cardiac disease, pregnant or lactating women. After informed consent was obtained, patients were prescribed to receive CO2 (cefixime 200 mg and Ofloxacin 200 mg) every 12 hrs for 7-14 days. At the time of entry into the study, base-line data were recorded. Patients were observed on 3rd, 7th and 14th day after enrollment into the study for assessment of symptoms. Following parameters were observed:
Assessment of primary outcome measure:
Following parameters were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the study: a) Body temperature on 3rd, 7th, and 14th day as well as time taken to achieve the normal body temperature b)
Evaluation of cough frequency c)
Evaluation of cough intensity d) Interference in sleep. Assessment of secondary outcome measure: Global assessment of efficacy and safety; efficacy was evaluated at the end of the study by investigator. The incidences of adverse events were recorded. Tolerability and efficacy was evaluated based on the global assessment by the investigator on a 3 point scale marked as excellent/good/poor.
Data analysis on patient demographics and various outcome measures were performed using graph pad prism 5. Comparison between the baseline values with the value on the 3rd, 7th and 14th day of treatment were made, as well as comparison in between these days by applying one way analysis of variance and the post hoc Turkeys multiple comparison test. Value of P<0.05 were considered significant.
A total of 279 patients were monitored in the study. Two hundred and fifteen patients were included for the final analysis. The patients were in the age range of 18-72 years old with 137 Male and 78 female. Study was conducted in 28 centres across India. Patients had a variety of complaint (Table 2.) including cough, fever and sleep interference.
Evaluation of Fever
Oral temperature was recorded at the baseline and on subsequent 3rd, 7th and 14th days of treatment. 93.95% patient reported fever on the first day of treatment. Body temperature was significantly reduced from baseline mean value 101± 0.49 °F to 99.72± 0.09°F, 98.18 ± 0.142 and 97.95 ± 0.161 on 3rd, 7th and 14th days of treatment respectively. The reduction in body temperature was significantly (p<0.05) lower from baseline to 3rd day and onwards (Figure 1)
Evaluation of Cough Intensity With regards to cough intensity, there was significant reduction in cough intensity at days: 3 rd, 7th and 14th day from baseline. On day 3rd cough intensity was reduced by 29.4% (1.94±0.08 vs. 2.75±0.05) (p<0.0001), on the day 7th cough intensity was reduced by 58.90% (1.13±0.06 vs. 2.75±0.05) (p<0.0001) and on 14th day it was reduced by 79.63% (.56±0.06 vs. 2.75±0.05) (p<0.001) from the base line (Figure 2). On the basis of turkeys multiple comparison test there was significant lowering (p<0.05) in the cough intensity not only from the baseline but also there was significant lowering in cough intensity in subsequent days of observation i.e. 3rd, 7th and 14th day. Cough intensity was recorded as mild, moderate and severe with numbering as 1, 2 and 3 respectively while no cough or slight cough numbered as 0 or less than 1.
Evaluation of cough frequency With regards to cough frequency, there were repeated bouts of cough at the time of diagnosis; mean ± SD value was 15.59 ± 11.65 at base line. On day 3rd and onward the number of bouts of cough was significantly reduced from baseline. On the day 3rd number of bouts of cough was reduced by 31.61% (10.6±8.7 vs. 15.5 ± 11.6) (p<0.05), on 7 th day it was reduced by 62.58% (5.804±5.707 vs. 15.59 ± 11.65) (p<0.05) from the base line and on the 14th day of treatment it was reduced by 86.96% (2.024±3.751 vs. 15.59 ± 11.65) (p<0.05). Also the number of bouts of cough was significantly reduced in the subsequent days on 3rd vs.7th and 7th vs.14th day of the treatment (Figure 3).
Evaluation of sleep Interference
There was frequent nocturnal awakening at the time of diagnosis; mean±SD value was 4.12± 3.13; this nocturnal awakening was due to coughing interfering with sound sleep. On 3rd day nocturnal awakening was reduced to 2.62±2.27 and on 7th day it was further reduced to 1.31± 1.7 and on 14th day there was no or few cases of nocturnal awakening mean value was 0.581 ± 1.1. There was significant reduction in the nocturnal awakening from the baseline on 3rd day of treatment and onward 7th and 14th day of treatment (P<0.05).
Evaluation of Respiratory rate There was increased respiratory rate at the baseline; mean value±SD was 27.78± 12.8; there was significant lowering in respiratory rate at days: 7th and 14th day from baseline. On day 3rd respiratory rate was 25.37± 13.7 (non significant from base line), on the day 7th it was reduced to 21.4±4.89 (p<0.05) and on 14th day it was further reduced to 19.9±4.31) (p<0.05) from the base line (Figure 5).
Concerning the adverse effect; rare cases of nausea (1%), headache (1%) and epigastric pain (2%) were reported which was of mild to moderate intensity and did not require discontinuation of therapy.
Global efficacy and safety evaluation
As per investigators assessment about efficacy of CO2 tablet (Cefixime 200 + Ofloxacin 200 mg), 98% of patient reported good to excellent and only 2 % of patient reported poor efficacy. As per investigators assessment about tolerability 97.90% of patient reported good to excellent and 2.1 % of patient reported poor tolerability.
Respiratory tract infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In World Health Report 2004, the World Health Organization estimated that respiratory tract infections were the fourth major cause of mortality, responsible for 4.0 million deaths or 6.9% of the global number of deaths in 20026 . Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common and potentially serious illness that is associated with morbidity and mortality. Although medical care has improved during the past decades, it is still potentially lethal. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most frequent microorganism isolated. Treatment includes mandatory antibiotic therapy and organ support as needed7 . Nearly 80% of the treatment for this condition is provided in the outpatient setting. Treatment of CAP for the most part is empirical; therefore, any antibiotic treatment should cover both typical and atypical pathogens. The beta-lactams have historically been considered standard therapy for the treatment of CAP. However, the impact of rising resistance rates is now a primary concern facing physicians8 . In one study it has been found that in the management of community acquired pneumonia, mono-therapy was effective in 70% of cases; the combination of two or more antibiotics (cephalosporin + quinolones) was required in 91.2% of patients9 . The combination of a fluoroquinolone and a β- lactam, which are directed against different targets (one for DNA gyrase and other cell wall) improve efficacy compared with a fluoroquinolone alone and may reduce the chance of fluoroquinoloneresistant bacteria.10
Improved efficacy of the combination compared with a fluoroquinolone alone is considered because of its synergistic effect; Cefixime inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis and ofloxacin affects bacterial DNA gyrase. As both acts on different target sites, combination provides synergistic effect against most of the pathogens. In the present study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination of cefixime and ofloxacin (CO2 tablet) in respiratory tract infection on various objective and subjective parameters like evaluation of fever, cough frequency, cough intensity and interference in sleep. Fever which is commonly associated in respiratory tract infection (93.95%) was significantly reduced from the baseline on 3rd, 7th and 14th day of the treatment.The mean defervescence time (no fever) was 2.45±1.68 days with combined therapy of cefixime plus ofloxacin. This result was comparable to the previous study on the use of combination of cefixime and ofloxacin in the treatment of typhoid fever, where the mean defervescence time was 3.2 days11 . With regard to cough intensity, there was significant reduction in cough intensity at days: 3 rd, 7th and 14th day from baseline. On day 3rd cough intensity was reduced by 29.4% (1.94±0.08 vs. 2.75±0.05) (p<0.0001), and reduced by 58.90% (1.13±0.06 vs. 2.75±0.05) (p<0.0001) and 79.63% (.56±0.06 vs. 2.75±0.05) (p<0.001) respectively on 7th and 14th day of treatment from the base line. Regarding the cough frequency, there were repeated bouts of cough at the time of diagnosis; mean ± SD value was 15.59 ± 11.65 at base line. On day 3rd and onward the number of bouts of cough was significantly reduced from baseline. Similarly there was increased respiratory rate which was lowered down to normal on 7th and 14th day of treatment. Regarding the evaluation of global efficacy and tolerability by the investigator, the combination showed very good efficacy and excellent tolerability and safety. Concerning the adverse effect; rare cases of nausea (1%), headache (1%) and epigastric pain (2%) has been found which was of mild to moderate intensity and did not require discontinuation of therapy.
In conclusion this fixed dose combination of cefixime and ofloxacin (CO2 Tablet) antibiotic therapy achieves a better outcome for the empirical management of respiratory tract infection with excellent efficacy, tolerability and safety in the treatment of respiratory tract infection.
Authors acknowledge the immense help received from the scholars whose articles are cited and included in references of this manuscript. The authors are also grateful to authors / editors / publishers of all those articles, journals and books from where the literature for this article has been reviewed and discussed. We also acknowledge the support of following doctors for providing the observations on effect of CO2 in patients suffering from RTI. Lucknow: Dr. Rajesh Shah, Dr. Anshuman Rai, Dr. R. C. Verma, Dr. Brijesh Shukla Bahraich: Dr. Vinay Shrivastav, Dr. A. K. Verma, Dr. Shaikh Ahmad Ambala: Dr. Deepak Saxena, Dr. Ashok Sasan, Dr. M. L. Bassi Hisar: Dr. Sanjay Sharma Faizabad: Dr. Mohd. Siddiqui, Dr. F. B. Singh, Dr. A. K. R., Dr. Nanak Sharan, Dr. S. K. Pathak Amravati: Dr. Vikram Lamkhade, Dr. S. S. Bardia, Dr. Sandip Dankhade, Dr. Rajendra Nistane, Dr. Indranil Thakare Yamuna Nagar: Dr. Anup Gupta, Dr. Hemant Kedwani, Dr. Ranbir Panjeta Dhanbad: Dr. B. N. Das, Dr. S. K. Bhagania Assam: Dr. B. N. Singh Ahmednagar: Dr. Sambhaji Pansambal Malegaon: Dr. Yashwant Patil Dibrugarh: Dr. Nitin Bhartra, Dr. Dilip Gogol Orai: Dr. R. K. Sharma, Dr. S. G. Gupta Pathankot: Dr. Davinder Verma Jamshedpur: Dr. J. N. Dandapar, Dr. S. Mouar, Dr. Subodh Kumar, Dr. Bhagadal Mohan Gurgaon: Dr. Harish Khemchandam, Dr. Satish Kumar Agartala: Dr. Punyakrit Debbarma, New Delhi: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Dr. Poonam Shingala, Dr. R. L. Nagrani Delhi: Dr. Rajinder Sharma, Dr. Sanjay Dhar, Dr. T. K. Chakraborty, Dr. Vinod Kumar, Dr. D. D. Arora, Dr. (Mrs.) Suman Bhagi, Dr. Rajani Sidhwa, Dr. V. K. Awana, Dr. Amarnath, Dr. V. K. Awana, Dr. R. N. Jain, Dr. Sunil Agarwal, Dr. N. K. Satija, Dr. Vikas Jain, Dr. Gopal Jha, Dr. Virendra Nath, Dr. G. N. Narang, Dr. S. K. Johri, Dr. Sarvesh Kumar, Dr. V. K. Gautam, Dr. Sunil Kumar Saxena Kanpur: Dr. Rajesh Verma, Dr. (Mrs.) K. K. Sharma, Dr. Rajesh Verma, Dr. Shobha, Dr. Vishnu Tandon, Dr. V. K. Tandon, Dr. A. K. Shrivastava, Dr. Murlidhar Matlani, Dr. Anjali Gangwar, Dr. Raghvendra Singh, Dr. Ajay Pandey Etawah: Dr. Neelam, Dr. Priyanka Pal, Dr. R. S. Singh, Dr. R. S. Pal Jhansi: Dr. Balbir Gupta, Dr. Alka Prakash, Dr. Nisha Shrivastava, Dr. Satish Agrawal Gwalior: Dr. A. K. Goyal, Dr. D. R. Moghe, Dr. Navin Kushwah Indore: Dr. Sheela Krishnan, Dr. Anil Kutumbale Balasore: Dr. Shreekanta Das, Dr. S. C. Mohanty Pusad: Dr. Sanjay Bhangde, Dr. Sham Jadhao, Dr. Santosh Rewankar, Dr. Satish Ghule, Dr. Sandip Gaikwad Others: Dr. Md. Salim, Dr. M. K. Shaikh, Dr. Meenakshi Rajput, Dr. Ravindra Kumar, Dr. Sidharth Vir, Dr. Mridul Chichra, Dr. Rita Gupta, Dr. R. Jain, Dr. Smita Shankar, Dr. H. C. Goswami, Dr. Nikhat Siddihiqui, Dr. Mohd. Sohail, Dr. M. K. Jha, Dr. Prawin Chandra, Dr. (Mrs.) Bahekar, Dr. Arun Somani, Dr. D. T. Bahekar, Dr. Subroto Kundu, Dr. Anwar Habeeb Khan, Dr. Rajesh Sharma, Dr. D. K. Arora, Dr. Nasir Subhan, Dr. V. K. Verma, Dr. R. S. Anand, Dr. I. K. Shukla, Dr. B. C. Jain, Dr. Vipul Patadia, Dr. Archana Jamtha, Dr. P. S. Shinde, Dr. S. M. Ranawade, Dr. Praveen Jain, Dr. Sane, Dr. N. K. Upadge, Dr. Faraah, Dr. S. N. Rao.
1. Laopaiboon M, Panpanich R, Lerttrakarnnon P. Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory infection. The Cochrane Library 2011; Issue 11: Page No. 1
2. Legnani D. Role of oral antibiotics in treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 1997; 27: 41–7
3. Brown PD, Lerner SA. Community-acquired pneumonia Lancet 1998; 352:1295–302
4. A. Kucers, S.Crowe, M.L. Grayson, J. Hoy The use of antibiotics 1997; 5th edition: Page No. 409-12, 986
5. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; Community Management of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Adults, June 2002; 59: Page No.8
6. World Health Organization.The World Health Report changing history. Geneva, Austria 2004: Page No. 120, 126.
7. Caballero and Rello Combination antibiotic therapy for community acquired pneumonia; Annals of Intensive Care 2011, 1:48: Page No. 1-7
8. Segreti J, House HR, Siegel RE. Principles of antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting Jul 2005 Am J Med.;118 Suppl 7A:21S-28S
9. Sanguinetti CM, De Benedetto F, Donner CF; ISOCAP Study Group. GP management of community-acquired pneumonia in Italy: the ISOCAP study. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2005 Mar;63(1):23-9
10. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from January 1992-April 2000, Am J Infect Control. 2000 Dec; 28(6):429-48.
11. Indian Medical Gazette August 2010, Vol.CXLIV, No. 8, Page No. 290-94