IJCRR - 6(4), February, 2014
CASE BASED LECTURES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LECTURES FOR TEACHING MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY TO UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
Author: Suvarna Sande Tathe, A. L. Singh
Background and Objectives: Routinely for teaching large number of students, didactic lecture (DL) is used which is a teacher centered process, promotes passive learning and fails to motivate the students. Case based lecture (CBL) is an interactive student centered approach and promotes active learning. Hence the present study was undertaken to assess whether CBL is an effective teaching tool for the Medical Microbiology and to evaluate students’ perception about this new methodology. Method: 78 students from second year MBBS fifth semester were included in the study. First they had conventional DL and next time they were exposed to CBL. Pretest and post test on DL and CBL topics were taken. Feedback regarding DL and CBL topics and CBL methodology were taken on Likert 5 point scale. Data from pre and post test scores was analyzed by paired t test. Result: The post test scores and gain in learning in CBL session were significantly higher than that of didactic lecture (p value <0.001). Feedback on DL and CBL topics showed that CBL was more effective than DL in understanding the topic. Students responded that, CBL had improved their learning skills, independent learning abilities, analytical skills indicating that CBL is an effective method in a large classroom setting than didactic lecture. Conclusion: To improve the outcome of didactic lecture and to promote active learning, CBL can be an effective teaching tool.
Keywords: case based lecture, medical microbiology, active learning
Suvarna Sande Tathe, A. L. Singh. CASE BASED LECTURES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LECTURES FOR TEACHING MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY TO UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS International Journal of Current Research and Review. 6(4), February, 35-41
1. Sprawls P. Evolving models for medical physics education and training: a global perspective. Biomed Imaging intervention J. 2008;4:e16.
2. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34: e421–4.
3. Williams B. Case based learning: A review of the literature: Is there scope for this educational paradigm in prehospital education? Emerg Med J 2005;22: 577-81.
4. Neal R. Chamberlain, Melissa K. Stuart, Vineet K. Singh and Neil J. Sargentini. Utilization of case presentations in medical microbiology to enhance relevance of basic science for medical students.Medical Education Online vol.17, 2012.
5. KoIb, D. A. (1984) Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
6. SPSS for windows, version 22.214.171.1241 Chicago: SPSS Inc.
7. Kumar V, Gadbury-Amyot CC. A case-based and team-based learning model in oral and maxillofacial radiology. J Dental Educ. 2012;76:330–7.
8. Yasin I. Tayem. The Impact of Small Group Case-based Learning on Traditional Pharmacology Teaching. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013 February; 13(1): 115–120.
9. Ciraj AM, Vinod P, Ramnarayan K. Enhancing active learning in microbiology through case-based learning: Experiences from an Indian medical school. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53:729–33.
10. Ochsendorf FR, Boehncke WH, Sommerlad M, Kaufmann R. Interactive large-group teaching in a dermatology course. Med Teach. 2006;28:697-701.
11. Blewett EL, Kisamore JL. Evaluation of an interactive, case-based review session in teaching medical microbiology. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:56.
12. Tarnvik A. Revival of the case method: a way to retain student-centered learning in a postPBL era. Med Teach. 2007;29:e32–36.