IJCRR - 6(20), October, 2014
COMPARISON OF TREADMILL VERSUS CYCLE ERGOMETER TRAINING ON FUNCTIONAL EXERCISE CAPACITY IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS
Author: Zahara K. Polen, Snehal Joshi
Background : There is an increasing awareness among the people about fitness and health. The bicycle ergometer and treadmill are the commonest forms of indoor aerobic exercises. Motor driven treadmill exercise is similar to walking or jogging or running depending upon the speed of the treadmill. In case of bicycle ergometer the amount of exercise can be controlled voluntarily by pedaling the cycle with predefined resistance. Aim of Study: The study was aimed at finding out the effects of these commonly used machines in gyms and in cardiovascular rehabilitation and comparing these effects. Methodology: type of study – experimental type. • Subjects were randomly allotted into two groups of 10 each. One group underwent treadmill training and the second group underwent cycle ergometer training for 30min, 3days per week for four weeks. The intensity of training was within 60% to 70% of age matched target heart rate(5) which was monitored using pulse oximeter.(12) • Shuttle walk test was admistered pre and post training and the results were recorded. • Vo2 was calculated using the formula (0.0289 *distance)+17.46.(6) • Results were analysed using paired t test for intra group analysis and unpaired t test for inter group analysis. Results: According to the study conducted the increase in shuttle walk distance and Vo2 values post treadmill training and cycle ergometer training were found to be extremely significant. No significant difference was seen between the improvements in two groups.Conclusion: Our study concludes that, treadmill and bicycle ergometer are equally effective in improving functional exercise capacity.
Keywords: Fitness, Aerobic exercises, Shuttle walk test, Vo2 values, Heart rate, Treadmill, Cycle ergometer
Zahara K. Polen, Snehal Joshi. COMPARISON OF TREADMILL VERSUS CYCLE ERGOMETER TRAINING ON FUNCTIONAL EXERCISE CAPACITY IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS International Journal of Current Research and Review. 6(20), October, 61-65
1. Dr Wener Hoeger, Sharon Hoeger Principles and labs for fitness and wellness, 12th edition.
2. American College of Sports Medicine ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription 8th edition.
3. Carolyn Kisner, Lynn-Allen Colby Therapeutic exercise 5th edition, pages 165, 232-240.
4. Vanessa Noonan, Elizabeth Dean Submaximal Exercise Testing: Clinical Application & Interpretation Physical Therapy Journal, Vol 80, August 2000, pages 782-807.
5. W.D. McArdle, F.I. Katch and V.L. Katch Exercise Physiology 6th edition, Chap. 21.
6. Patricia J. Ohtake Field tests for aerobic capacity for children and older adults Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal, Vol 6 June 2005, pages 3-11.
7. Center for Disease control and Prevention CDC Physiological responses and long term adaptation to exercise Physical activity and health, chap. 3.
8. Dr R. Kisan, Dr S. Kisan, Dr Anitha, Dr Chandrakala Treadmill and bicycle ergometer exercise: cardiovascular response comparison Global Journal of Medical Research, Vol 12 June 2012, pages 23-25.
9. Fabien Basset, Marcel Boulay Treadmill and Cycle ergometer tests are interchangeable to monitor triathletes annual training Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (2003) 2, pages 110-116.
10. Leung, R.W.M. , Alison, J.A., McKeough, Z.J., Peters, M.J Ground walk training improves functional exercise capacity more than cycle training in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A randomized trial Journal of physiotherapy, Vol. 56 June 2010, pages 105-112
11. Anne Zeni, Martin Hoffman, Philip Clifford Energy Expenditure with Indoor Exercise Machines Journal of American Medical Association Vol 275, May1996, pages 1424-1427
12. Y. Iyriboz,S. Powers, J. Morrow, D. Ayers and G. Landry Accuracy of pulse oximeters in estimating heart rate at rest and during exercise Br J Sports Med 1991, pages 162-164