IJCRR - 7(7), April, 2015
EVALUATION OF STUDENT SEMINAR IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVE
Author: Jitendra R. Patel, Dharmik S. Patel, Rajesh Desai, Jasmin Parmar, Ravi Thaker, Nikita D. Patel
Background: Teaching methods in India is dictated by the ancient teaching method. With modern times, teaching method should be improvised. Nowadays a deluge of techniques is encouraged to increase the interest of students in learning.
Aim and Objective: The purpose of the study was to examine the approach of 1st year medical students of one private medical college in Gujarat towards seminar presentation.
Method: Study was undertaken on 110 students of 1st year MBBS. A questionnaire was prepared regarding effectiveness of seminar in learning process and feedback was taken from all 110 students.
Result: More than 76% students responded positively to all questionnaire asked regarding seminar than teacher-centric method.
Conclusion: Students’ attitude was very decisive for an active learning method like seminar and it should be promoted in routine practice.
Keywords: Seminar, Medical education, Teaching methods
Jitendra R. Patel, Dharmik S. Patel, Rajesh Desai, Jasmin Parmar, Ravi Thaker, Nikita D. Patel. EVALUATION OF STUDENT SEMINAR IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVE International Journal of Current Research and Review. 7(7), April, 06-09
1. Ananthakrishnan N. Medical education in India: Is it still possible to reverse the downhill trend?; Natl Med J India. 2010; 23(3):156-60.
2. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Aghajani M. Traditional Lectures, Socratic Method and Student Lectures: Which One do the Students Prefer?. Webmed Central Medical Education. 2011;2:WMC001746.
3. Schreiber EB, Fukuta J, Gordon F. Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education. 2010;10:68.
4. Aditya Jain, Ramta Bansal, KD Singh, Avnish Kumar. Attitude of medical and dental first year students towards teaching methods in a medical college of northern India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research; 2014; 8(12):XC05-XC08.
5. Bonwell C, Eison J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington DC: Jossey-Bass.
6. Likert, Rensis. “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes”. Archives of Psychology. 1932; 140: 1–55.
7. S. Gopalakrishnan, P. Ganesh kumar. Community medicine teaching and evaluation: scope of betterment. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015; 9(1):XE01-XE05.
8. Doucet MD, Purdy RA, Kaufman DM, Langille DB. Comparison of problem based learning and lecture format in continuing medical education on headache and management. Med Educ. 1998; 32:590-96.
9. Hrepic Z, Zollman DA, Rebello SN. Comparing students and experts’ understanding of the content of a lecture. J Sci Edu Tech. 2007;16:213-24.
10. Vella F. Medical education: Capitalizing on the lecture method. FASEB J. 1992;6:811–12.
11. Twigg CA. The need for a national learning infrastructure. Educom Rev. 1994;29:4–6.
12. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Campbell M, Cooke M, Jones HW., III Evaluation of the seminar method to improve clinical teaching. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:315–22.
13. Benek-Rivera J, Matthews VE. Active learning with jeopardy: Students ask the questions. Journal of Management Education. 2004;28:104-18.