IJCRR - Recent Advances in Dentistry for better Oral Health, March, 2021
Pages: 166-172
Digitally Assisted Implant Therapy
Author: Suyog Dharmadhikari, Apoorva Mhatre, Juhi Gundavda, Daya D Shetye, Priyanshi Shah, Heer Madhvi
Category: Healthcare
[Download PDF]
Abstract:
Introduction: Techniques and workflows have been developed to use guided surgery in most clinical patient case applications, such as immediate implant placement; tilted implant/hybrid restoration and implant placement. Aims: Integrating the guide sleeves is a manual process, as is the removal of holding or support structures. Methods/Materials: Different techniques have been developed to transfer the ideal implant position to the surgical field, using templates. Implant planning software matches CT data to wax up information, allowing the clinician to view a 3D image of the jaw when planning implant position. Results: Guided implant surgery makes it easy for the clinician in rendering optimal clinical outcome. Computer-assisted implantology has found to overcome the errors encountered during implant site preparation more precisely. Conclusion: The protocols that need to be followed by this technique are based upon the concept of prosthetic-driven implantology and CT-scan analysis.
Keywords: Surgical Guide, Data Acquisition, STL File, Intraoral Scanner, Computer assisted, Guided surgery
Citation:
Suyog Dharmadhikari, Apoorva Mhatre, Juhi Gundavda, Daya D Shetye, Priyanshi Shah, Heer Madhvi. Digitally Assisted Implant Therapy International Journal of Current Research and Review. Recent Advances in Dentistry for better Oral Health, March, 166-172
References:
1. Zupnik J, Kim S-W, Ravens D, Karimbux N, Guze K. Factors associated with dental implant survival: a 4-year retrospective analysis. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 1390−1395
2. Cochran DL. The scientific basis for and clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI Dental Implant System: a consensus report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11(Suppl. 1): 33−58.
3. Lin CC, Wu CZ, Huang MS, Huang CF, Cheng HC, Wang DP. Fully digital workflow for planning static guided implant surgery: a prospective accuracy study. J. Clin. Med. 2020 Apr;9(4):980.
4. Schubert, O., Schweiger, J., Stimmelmayr, M.. Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery – workflow and reliability. Br Dent J 226, 101–108 (2019).
5. K. M. D’Souza, M. A. Aras, “Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review,” Oral implantology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 643–652, 2012
6. Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, van Assche N, van Steenberghe D. The use of CT scan-based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(6):454–474.
7. Tallarico, M., Xhanari, E., Kim, Y.J., Cocchi, F., Martinolli, M., Alushi, A., Baldoni, E.E., Meloni, S.M., 2019. Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using conventional impression and scan model or intraoral digital impression: A randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up. Int. J. Oral Implantol, 12, pp.197-206.
8. Derksen, W., Wismeijer, D., Flügge, T., Hassan, B. and Tahmaseb, A., The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2019. 30(10), pp.1005-1015.
9. Gary Orentlicher, Douglas Goldsmith, Andrew Horowitz, Applications of 3-Dimensional Virtual Computerized Tomography Technology in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Current Therapy, J. Maxillofac. Surg, Volume 68, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1933-1959.
10. Wat PY, Chow TW, Luk HW,. Precision surgical template for implant placement: a new systematic approach. Clin Implant Dent Relat 2002; 4(2): 88–92.
11. Jacobs, R., Salmon, B., Codari, M., Hassan, B., Bornstein, M.M., 2018. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health, 18(1), pp.1-16.
12. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:25–42.
13. Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Periodontol 2000 2014; 66: 203–213.
14. Farhan, F.A., Ali-Jameel-Abdul Sahib, A.A., Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible. J. Clin. Exp. Dent,2021. 13(5), p.e487.
15. Jacob HB, Wyatt GD, Buschang PH. Reliability and validity of intraoral and extraoral scanners. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:38.
16. Molinero-Mourelle, P., Lam, W., Cascos-Sánchez, R., Azevedo, L. and Gómez-Polo, M., 2019. Photogrammetric and intraoral digital impression technique for the rehabilitation of multiple unfavorably positioned dental implants: A clinical report. Oral implantology, 45(5), pp.398-402
17. Ramiro, G.P., Hassan, B., Navarro, A.F., Coronel, C.A., Cortes, A.R.G., Baptista, O.H.P., Zambrana, N.R.M., Digitalization in restorative dentistry. In Digital Restorative Dentistry, 2019. (pp. 7-39).
18. Azari A, Nikzad S. Flapless Implant Surgery: Review of the Literature and Report of 2 Cases With Computer-Guided Surgical Approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(5):1015–1021.
19. Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-7operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(9):980-988.
20. Al Yafi, F., Camenisch, B., Al-Sabbagh, M., Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dental Clinics,2019. 63(3), pp.381-397.
21. Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L,. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2018;18:28–40.
22. Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A,. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1157–63
23. Ozan O, Orhan K, Turkyilmaz I. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1755–61.
24. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M,. Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:1377–87.
|