IJCRR - 7(18), September, 2015
MODIFIED SCHIRMER TEST SCREENING FOR DRY EYE DISEASE IN RURAL POPULATION
Author: Virendra Singh Lodha
Objective: The present study was undertaken to screen rural patients for dry eye disease by a modified Schirmer 1 test without anaesthesia with a cut off of 10 mm wetting of Schirmer test strip.
Methods: Schirmer 1 test without anaesthesia was performed on 140 patients (65 males and 75 females) over 40 years of age from rural background after obtaining informed consent and after applying some exclusion criteria. The test was aborted as soon wetting of 10 mm of Schirmer test strip occurred and time noted. The patients who did not achieve 10 mm of wetting on Schirmer test over 5 minute’s time were labelled Schirmer test positive.
Results: The incidence of positive Schirmer1 test (without anaesthesia) was 16.4% in the studied group of 140 patients with a higher incidence in females over 50 years of age. Out of 140 patients screened, 63% patients achieved a wetting of 10 mm of Schirmer test strip in 2 or less than 2 minutes.
Conclusion: Modified Schirmer 1 test (without anaesthesia) with a cut off limit of 10 mm can be a better option for dry eye disease screening in large volume based ophthalmic practice and eye camps as it reduces test time and causes less discomfort to the patient, and the procedure does not require any equipment other than readily available Schirmer test strips.
Keywords: Schirmer test, Dry eye disease
Virendra Singh Lodha. MODIFIED SCHIRMER TEST SCREENING FOR DRY EYE DISEASE IN RURAL POPULATION International Journal of Current Research and Review. 7(18), September, 38-40
1. Smith JA, Albenz J, Beglet C et al. The epidemiology of dry eye disease: Report of the epidemiology subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Disease Workshop (2007), Ocul Surf. 2007, 5: 93–107.
2. Lemp MA, Advances in understanding and managing dry eye disease, Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sept; 146(3): 350–356.
3. International Dry eye Disease Workshop (DEWS). The definition and Classification and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop Ocul Surf. 2007, 5: 75–92.
4. Savini G, Prabhawasat P, Kozima T, Grueterich M, Espana E, Goto e. The challange of dry eye diagnosis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008; 2(1):31–35.
5. Smith J, Nichols KK, Baldwin EK. Current patterns in the use of diagnostic tests in dry eye evaluation. Cornea. 2008; 27(6):656– 662.
6. Schirmer O. Studien zur physiologie und pathologie der tranenabsonderung Und tranenabfuhr. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1903; 56:197–291.
7. Nelson PS. A shorter Schirmer tear test. Optom Mon. 1982; 73:568–9.
8. Bawazeer AM, Hodge WG. One-minute Shirmer test with anaeasthesia. Cornea. 2003; 22 (4): 285–287.
9. Sahai A, Malik P. Dry Eye:Prevalence and attributable risk factors in a Hospital based population. Ind J ophthal 2005; 53: 87– 91.
10. Gupta N, Prasad I, Jain R, D’Souza P. Estimating the prevalence of dry eye Indian patients attending tertiary ophthalmology clinic. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2010; 104: 247–255.
11. Basak SK, Pal PP, Basak S, Bandhyopadhyay A, Choudhary S, Sar S. Prevalence of Dry Eye Diseases in hospital-based population in West Bengal, Eastern India. J Indian Med Assoc. 2012; 110: 789–794.
12. Suphakasem S, Lekskul M, Rangsin R. Assessment of different wetting time and paper strip size of Schirmer test in dry eye patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2012, 95 Suppl 5: S107–110.