IJCRR - Vol 07 Issue 21, November, 2015
EVALUATION OF MYERS-BRIGGS PERSONALITY TRAITS IN OFFICES AND ITS EFFECTS ON PRODUCTIVITY OF EMPLOYEES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
Author: Zahra Poursafar, Nandineni Rama Devi, Lewlyn L. R. Rodrigues
Background: Office design after physical requirement has a second concern which belongs to Psychology. The concept of Psychology and office spaces is a prominent issue for designers when planning stages of a redesign or a new workspace. Offices or workspaces today are an evolution of sorts affected by the truly diverse mixture of architectural and psychological elements which are working together in the same space.
Aim: The focus of first part of this research is to identify the employee’s Personality type in Architect’s offices in two Asian countries; Iran and India. The second part of the study investigates the existing productivity of employees to identify the influence of Personality types.
Methodology: The good-quality data has been collected from a well- designed questionnaire. The mode of the delivery was through the online questionnaire and hardy copy ones.
Result: The findings of this study explore the dominant Personality type in Architect’s offices and also reveal that productivity in an Architect’s office interior is affected by employee’s Personality types.
Conclusions: Designers benefit from knowing occupant’s Personality types. Since each Personality types have own characteristics, needs and desires, then outcome of the study could be used as a guideline for designer to have a more successful project. Differences between Personality types would have positive and negative effects on their Productivity. The results would help designers to improve the physical environment of office suits to occupant’s wishes.
Keywords: Psychology, Personality types, Architect’s office, Productivity
Zahra Poursafar, Nandineni Rama Devi, Lewlyn L. R. Rodrigues. EVALUATION OF MYERS-BRIGGS PERSONALITY TRAITS IN OFFICES AND ITS EFFECTS ON PRODUCTIVITY OF EMPLOYEES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY International Journal of Current Research and Review. Vol 07 Issue 21, November, 53-58
1. Oberascher, L. 2015. Available from: http://leoncolor.com.
2. Davies, H. The psychological and physical needs of workers impacting office design, in COBRA 2010: Proceedings of the RICS Foundation Construction and Building Research Conference, COBRA, London, England. 2010.
3. Davies, H. Productivity and the knowledge worker, QUT Research Week International Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 2005.
4. McCrae, RR, Costa, PT. Personality in adulthood: a five-factor theory perspective, New York, Guilford Press. 2003.
5. Vischer, J. The concept of workplace performance and its value to managers California Management Review. 2006; 49(2): 1-18.
6. Oseland, N. The impact of psychological needs on office design, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 2009; 11(4): 244-254.
7. Myers, I B, Mc Caulley, M H, Quenk M H, Hammer A L. Manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator instrument. 3rd ed. Mountain View, USA: CCP, Inc, 2009.
8. Myers-Briggs type indicator manual, WC Personality, Inc., 2012. Available from: http://calpoly.edu/~cwang24/mbtimanual. pdf.
9. Mohr, R. Office space is a revenue enhancer, not an expense, 1996, Available from: http://nreionline.com/mag/office-spacerevenue-enhancer-not-expense.
10. Mc Forson, J E. Impact of Motivation on the Productivity of Employees at Gtbank Ghana, 2012, Available from: http://ir.knust. edu.gh/bitstream/123456789 /4297/1/JOYCE%20ESSEL%20 MC%20FORSON.pdf.
11. Neely, G H. The Relationship between Employee Morale and Employee Productivity, 1999. Available from: http://www.usfa. fema.gov/pdf/efop/efo29954.pdf.