IJCRR - Vol 08 Issue 12, June, 2016
SCREENING OF ADULTERANTS IN MILK
Author: Pradeep S., P. Lakshminarayana, Varsha R., Shriya K. Kota
Milk is the most commonly adulterated consumable in India. The addition of urea, detergent, sugars and vanaspati oil to create synthetic milk render it unfit for consumption according to the standards that define the quality of milk. This paper investigates the different milk adulterants and two methods of detecting them. The chemical methods of testing and electrical conductance method were performed. It was found that urease test can detect as low as 0.2 g/L of urea present, iodine test for starch is able to detect 0.04g/L starch present and the sensitivity of Benedict’s test is 5g/L. It was also observed that there was significant difference in conductance of adulterant containing milk from that of raw milk. Therefore these methods can be used for reliable detection of adulterants and can be incorporated into a device for easy detection of adulterants.
Keywords: Adulteration, Conductance, Chemical methods
Pradeep S., P. Lakshminarayana, Varsha R., Shriya K. Kota. SCREENING OF ADULTERANTS IN MILK International Journal of Current Research and Review. Vol 08 Issue 12, June, 25-29
1. FAO/WHO. Assuring food safety and quality: guidelines for strengthening national food control systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, 2003. 28 p. (FAO food and nutrition paper no. 76).
2. S Das, M Sivaramakrishna, K Biswas, B Goswami (2011), Performance Study Of A ‘ Constant Phase angle Based ’ Impedance Sensor To Detect Milk Adulteration, Sensors and ActuatorsA:Physical, 167(2), 273–278.
3. A Singh, J Sharma and S R Bhatt (2011), Detection of ill-effects of urea adulterated milk in Varanasi, Food Science Research Journal, 2(1), 46-49.
4. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients) , The National Academies Press (2005).
5. The National Survey on Milk Adulteration 2011 (snap shot survey) was conducted by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.
6. H Kumar, A Kumar, P Kumari, S Jyotirmai and N B Tulsani (2000), A rapid estimation of urea in adulterated milk using dry reagent strip, Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, 7, 146- 147.
7. J A. C?pri??, Rodica C?pri??, (2006), Effect Of Mineral Composition On The Electrical Conductance Of Milk, Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, 12(1), 141-144.
8. B. Kaptan., S, Kay??o?lu., M. Demirci, (2011) The Relationship Between Some Physico-Chemical, Microbiological Characteristics and Electrical Conductivity of Milk Stored at Different Temperature, Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations,8(2), 13-21.
9. L.I. Ilie, L. Tudor, Anca Maria Gali? ,(2010) The Electrical Conductivity Of Cattle Milk And The Possibility Of Mastitis Diagnosis In Romania, Veterinary Medicine Scientific Papers, 43(2), 220-227.
10. Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India New Delhi 2012, manual of methods of analysis of foods (milk and milk products). p1-22
11. Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A. (2007), A quantitative starch–iodine method for measuring alpha-amylase and glucoamylase activities, Anal Biochem, 351(1), 146-148.