IJCRR - Vol 05 Issue 16, August, 2013
VALUE OF RAPID ANTIGEN ASSAY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PYOGENIC AND PARTIALLY TREATED MENINGITIS
Author: Shalini Bajaj, Deepandra Garg, Manish bajaj, Neha Agrawal, S.L. Mandowara
Objective: To assess the usefulness of rapid antigen assay in diagnosis of pyogenic meningitis and to compare CSF culture with Rapid antigen Assay in pyogenic meningitis in terms of percentage recovery of the pathogen. Research Design and Methods: The prospective observational study was conducted on all suspected cases of meningitis, admitted in Bal Chikitsalaya, Department of Paediatrics, RNT Medical College, Udaipur over a period of 6 months. A total of 20 children with pyogenic meningitis were enrolled in our study. Their haematological and CSF cytochemical findings, management, clinical course during illness and outcome were also recorded and analyzed. Rapid Antigen detection by Latex Agglutination Test was compared with CSF culture. Results: In our study, the overall positivity on Rapid Antigen assay was 85% of cases with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 100% respectively. This in sharp contrast to CSF gram’s stain and culture where the results were positive in 55% and 40% cases respectively.Streptococcus pneumoniae was the commonest organism isolated on Rapid antigen assay in 47.06% followed by Neisseria meningtidis in 35.29% and Hemophilus Influenzae in 11.76% .Case fatality rate was 15% in our study. Conclusions: We concluded that Rapid antigen asssay has high sensitivity and specificity .So, it can be advised as an additional laboratory investigation to found etiology of bacterial meningitis mainly in pretreated cases and also differentiate partially treated cases from that of tubercular meningitis as it is a common dilemma encountered by the clinicians.
Keywords: C–Reactive Protein, Neonatal Septicemia
Shalini Bajaj, Deepandra Garg, Manish bajaj, Neha Agrawal, S.L. Mandowara. VALUE OF RAPID ANTIGEN ASSAY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PYOGENIC AND PARTIALLY TREATED MENINGITIS International Journal of Current Research and Review. Vol 05 Issue 16, August, 47-53
1. Srivastava JR. Srivastava VK, Mehrotra SN and Samuel KC. Clinical and bacteriological study of pyogenic meningitis in children. Indian J Pediatric 1968: 35:423-28.
2. Vancent J, Quagliarello and Scheld WM, New perspective on bacterial meningitis Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 7: 603-608.
3. Mani R, Pradhan S, Nagarathna S, Wasiulla R, Chandramukhi A. Bacterio,logical profile of community acquired acute bacterial meningitis a 10 year retrospective study in a tertiary neurocare centre in South India. Indian J Med. Microbiology 2007; 25: 108-14
4. Sinha KK.Acute pyogenic meningitis. Some important aspect. Hospital Today 1999;4:209- 216
5. Dean A. Seehusen, M.D., Mark M. Reeves, M.D., And Demitri A. Fomin, M.D. Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis. American Family Physician 2003;68(6):1003-1008
6. Pandit L, Kumar S, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. Diagnosis of partially treated culture-negative bacterial meningitis using 16S rRNA universal primers and restriction endonuclease digestion. J Med Microbiol 2005; 54: 539-542.
7. Kumar L. Chitlangia S, Ayyagari A.The current status of pyogenic meningitis in children. Ind.Paediatrics. 1980; 17:438-444
8. Converse GM, Gwaltney JM, Strassburg DA, Handley JO.Alteration of cerebrospinal fluid findings by partial treatment of bacterial meningitis.J Pediatrics. 1973; 83(2): 220-225
9. Surinder K, Bineeta K, Megha M. Latex particle agglutination test as an adjunct to the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:395-7. 10. Prober CG. Central Nervous system infections .Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 2004;(17 ): 2038 -2044
11. Munqj FM, Starke JR. Tuberculosis. Nelson textbook of Pediatrics, 2004; (17):958-972 12. Forbes, B.A., D.F. Sahm, A.S. Weissfeld, eds. 2002. Meningitis and other infections of the central nervous system .Bailey and Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology, 11th ed. p. 907-916
13. Rao BN, Kashbur IM, Sembesh NM, Bargathy SM. Etiology and occurrence of acute bacterial meningitis in children in Benghazi, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 1998; 4 : 50-57. 14. Gupta BD, Dhande NR, An epidemiologic and clinical study of Pyogenic meningitis in children submitted to University of Rajasthan for MD (Ped.) 2002. 15. Chinchankar N, Mane M, Bhave S, Diagnosis and outcome of acute bacterial meningitis in early childhood. Indian Pediatrics 2002; 39: 914-921.
16. Bhat BV, Verma IC, Puri RK, Sinivasan S and Naini P. Prognostic indicator in pyogenic meningitis. Indian Pediatr. 1987; 24: 977-983. 17. Yang Y.H, Fu S.G. Penh H et al. Abuse of antibiotics in China and its potential interference in determining the etiology of pediatric bacterial disease. Pediatr. Infect Dis J 1993; 12:986-988. 18. Abdul Khaliq A Sallam. Etiology and presentation of acute bacterial meningitis in children at Al-Thawrah Hospital, Sana`a, Yemen J Ayub Med Coll Abottabad Oct - Dec 2004;16(4):40-3. 19. Choo K.E, Ariffin W.A, Ahmed T, Linn W.L, Gururaj A.K. Pyogenic meningitis in hospitalized children in Kelantan, Malaysia. Ann Trop Pediatr. 1990; 10(1) : 89-98. 20. Susana Chávez-Bueno, George H. McCracken Jr, Bacterial Meningitis in Children. Pediatric Clinics of North America 2005;52(3):795-810 21. B.K. Das, Rajesh Lal Gurubacharya, T.M. Mohapatra and O.P. Mishra. Bacterial Antigen Detection Test in Meningitis. Ind J Pediatrics 2003; 70 (10) : 799-801. 22. Doris L. Drow,David F. Welch, Diane Hensel,Kathy Eisenach,Earl Long And M. Slifkin Evaluation of the Phadebact CSF Test for Detection of the Four Most Common Causes of Bacterial Meningitis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Dec. 1983, p. 1358- 1361.